Skip to content
History · Year 13 · Britain Between the Wars 1918–1939 · Autumn Term

The General Strike of 1926: Causes

Students will evaluate the impact of the 1926 General Strike, analyzing its causes, the role of the trade unions and government, and its long-term consequences for industrial relations.

National Curriculum Attainment TargetsA-Level: History - Britain, 1906-1951A-Level: History - Industrial Relations and Labour History

About This Topic

The General Strike of 1926 originated in the coal industry's post-war struggles, where mine owners demanded wage cuts of up to 13% and longer hours after government subsidies ended in July 1925. Students analyze the miners' resolute stance, captured in their chant 'Not a penny off the pay, not a minute on the day,' alongside failed talks, the Samuel Commission's balanced but rejected proposals, and the TUC's decision for solidarity action. This escalated into a nine-day stoppage by 1.7 million workers across key industries, testing Britain's social fabric.

Positioned in the A-Level study of Britain 1906-1951, particularly industrial relations between the wars, the topic sharpens skills in causation, source interrogation, and evaluating government strategy under Stanley Baldwin. Students weigh economic factors like export slumps, the 1925 gold standard return, and class antagonisms through diaries, cabinet papers, and union pamphlets, fostering nuanced historical judgment.

Active learning excels for this topic. Role-plays of negotiations or collaborative source dissections make remote interwar tensions vivid, encourage perspective-taking, and solidify causal links through debate and peer teaching.

Key Questions

  1. Explain why the General Strike occurred and the grievances of the miners.
  2. Analyze how the government responded to the strike and its use of emergency powers.
  3. Evaluate the extent to which the strike weakened the trade union movement.

Learning Objectives

  • Analyze the economic and social grievances that led to the 1926 General Strike, focusing on the coal industry.
  • Evaluate the effectiveness of the government's response to the General Strike, including the use of emergency legislation and resources.
  • Compare the stated aims of the Trades Union Congress with the actual outcomes of the strike for organized labor.
  • Explain the role of key individuals and organizations, such as Stanley Baldwin and the TUC General Council, in the escalation and resolution of the strike.

Before You Start

Post-World War I Economic Challenges in Britain

Why: Students need to understand the broader economic context, including industrial decline and unemployment, that contributed to the tensions leading up to the strike.

The Rise of Trade Unionism in Britain

Why: Prior knowledge of the growth and influence of trade unions in the early 20th century is essential for understanding their role in organizing the general strike.

Key Vocabulary

SubsidyFinancial assistance given by the government to an industry, in this case, the coal industry, to keep prices low or support wages.
Samuel CommissionA royal commission established to investigate the coal industry and propose solutions to its economic problems, whose recommendations were largely rejected by both miners and owners.
Trades Union Congress (TUC)The national organization of trade unions in Great Britain, which coordinated the general strike action in 1926.
Emergency Powers ActLegislation passed by the government to grant extraordinary powers during the strike, allowing for the organization of essential services and the prosecution of strikers.

Watch Out for These Misconceptions

Common MisconceptionThe strike was mainly a communist-inspired revolution.

What to Teach Instead

Most participants acted from economic grievances, not ideology; role-plays help students embody miners' and TUC viewpoints, revealing legitimate wage disputes over revolutionary aims through sourced arguments.

Common MisconceptionThe government played a passive role in the lead-up.

What to Teach Instead

Baldwin actively subsidized mines then withdrew support strategically; station rotations expose cabinet decisions via memos, prompting students to reassess narratives in group discussions.

Common MisconceptionMiners' grievances were isolated from national issues.

What to Teach Instead

Broader factors like export declines linked local disputes nationally; chain-building activities connect dots, as pairs debate and refine chains collaboratively.

Active Learning Ideas

See all activities

Real-World Connections

  • Historians specializing in labor history use archival documents, such as cabinet minutes and union meeting records from 1926, to reconstruct the decision-making processes of the government and the TUC.
  • Contemporary journalists and commentators at the time reported on the strike's impact on daily life, documenting disruptions to transport and food supplies in cities like London and Manchester.

Assessment Ideas

Discussion Prompt

Pose the question: 'To what extent was the General Strike a victory for the miners?' Facilitate a class debate where students must use evidence from primary sources to support their arguments about the strike's impact on the coal industry and the miners' specific grievances.

Quick Check

Provide students with a short primary source excerpt, such as a newspaper report or a government circular from 1926. Ask them to identify two specific actions taken by either the government or the strikers and explain the immediate purpose of each action in 1-2 sentences.

Exit Ticket

Ask students to write down the single most significant cause of the 1926 General Strike, in their opinion, and briefly justify their choice with one piece of evidence discussed in class.

Frequently Asked Questions

What were the main causes of the 1926 General Strike?
Key causes included coal industry woes: falling exports, overcapacity, and subsidy withdrawal forcing wage cuts and hour extensions on miners. The TUC backed them after failed talks and the ignored Samuel Report, amid national economic strain from the gold standard. Students evaluate these via sources to see interwoven economic and social triggers.
How did miners' grievances spark the General Strike?
Miners faced 13% pay slashes and longer shifts post-subsidy; their defiance rallied TUC support for a sympathy strike. Analysis shows how 'Red Friday' 1921 hopes faded into 1926 crisis, with students using union speeches to trace escalation and solidarity logic.
What role did the government play in causing the strike?
Baldwin's Conservatives ended subsidies to cut deficits, rejecting Samuel's national pooling idea. This provoked owners' demands and TUC response; source work reveals calculated policy over reaction, helping students judge contingency versus inevitability.
How can active learning help teach the causes of the 1926 General Strike?
Role-plays let students negotiate as stakeholders, building empathy for positions and causal chains. Stations with sources promote targeted analysis, while debates sharpen evaluation. These methods make abstract economics tangible, boost retention through interaction, and mirror historical contingency for deeper A-Level skills.

Planning templates for History