History · Year 13

Active learning ideas

The General Strike of 1926: Causes

Active learning works for this topic because students need to grasp the complex interplay of economic pressures, human decisions, and ideological tensions that led to the strike. By engaging directly with primary sources and role-playing key figures, students move beyond memorizing dates to understanding how coal miners’ demands and government actions collided in 1926.

• National Curriculum Attainment Targets
• A-Level: History - Britain, 1906-1951
• A-Level: History - Industrial Relations and Labour History

• 35–50 min
• Pairs → Whole Class
• 4 activities

Activity 01

• Structured Academic Controversy
• 50 min · Small Groups

Role-Play: Mine Owners vs Miners Negotiations

Divide class into mine owners, miners' leaders, and TUC officials; provide sourced position papers for preparation. Groups negotiate terms in 15-minute rounds, then report outcomes to the class. Conclude with a vote on strike likelihood.

Explain why the General Strike occurred and the grievances of the miners.

Facilitation Tip

In the Role-Play activity, assign confident students as miners, mine owners, and TUC representatives to embody the perspectives they are studying, ensuring each group uses the primary source quotes provided.

What to look for

Pose the question: 'To what extent was the General Strike a victory for the miners?' Facilitate a class debate where students must use evidence from primary sources to support their arguments about the strike's impact on the coal industry and the miners' specific grievances.

• Analyze
• Evaluate
• Create
• Social Awareness
• Relationship Skills

Activity 02

• Structured Academic Controversy
• 45 min · Small Groups

Source Analysis Stations: Strike Causes

Set up stations with primary sources: miners' letters, Samuel Report excerpts, government memos, and newspaper cartoons. Groups rotate every 10 minutes, noting evidence for economic, political, and social causes. Share findings in a class matrix.

Analyze how the government responded to the strike and its use of emergency powers.

Facilitation Tip

During the Source Analysis Stations, circulate to clarify that students must identify both explicit and implicit causes in each document, not just surface-level details.

What to look for

Provide students with a short primary source excerpt, such as a newspaper report or a government circular from 1926. Ask them to identify two specific actions taken by either the government or the strikers and explain the immediate purpose of each action in 1-2 sentences.

• Analyze
• Evaluate
• Create
• Social Awareness
• Relationship Skills

Activity 03

• Structured Academic Controversy
• 35 min · Pairs

Cause-and-Effect Chain: Building Tensions

Provide cards with events, quotes, and factors; pairs sequence them into a visual chain from 1921 Red Friday to strike outbreak. Pairs present and justify links, incorporating peer feedback.

Evaluate the extent to which the strike weakened the trade union movement.

Facilitation Tip

For the Cause-and-Effect Chain activity, have pairs physically arrange their events on a timeline strip before linking them with arrows to reinforce chronological reasoning.

What to look for

Ask students to write down the single most significant cause of the 1926 General Strike, in their opinion, and briefly justify their choice with one piece of evidence discussed in class.

• Analyze
• Evaluate
• Create
• Social Awareness
• Relationship Skills

Activity 04

• Structured Academic Controversy
• 40 min · Pairs

Debate Carousel: Government Preparedness

Pairs prepare arguments for and against Baldwin's readiness; rotate to debate three stations with opposing pairs. Vote on strongest evidence after each round.

Explain why the General Strike occurred and the grievances of the miners.

Facilitation Tip

In the Debate Carousel, assign rotating groups to focus on separate government actions, such as the subsidy withdrawal or the Samuel Commission report, to ensure depth in each discussion.

What to look for

Pose the question: 'To what extent was the General Strike a victory for the miners?' Facilitate a class debate where students must use evidence from primary sources to support their arguments about the strike's impact on the coal industry and the miners' specific grievances.

• Analyze
• Evaluate
• Create
• Social Awareness
• Relationship Skills

A few notes on teaching this unit

Experienced teachers approach this topic by centering student inquiry on primary sources rather than textbook summaries, as the strike’s causes are often oversimplified. Avoid framing the strike solely as a political uprising; emphasize the economic desperation of miners and the government’s strategic withdrawal of support. Research shows that when students analyze real negotiations and commission reports, they better understand the human stakes behind policy decisions.

Successful learning looks like students explaining how wage cuts and failed negotiations escalated into a national strike, using evidence from negotiations, commission reports, and union communications. They should connect local disputes to broader economic trends and evaluate the legitimacy of grievances versus revolutionary claims.

---

Watch Out for These Misconceptions

• During the Role-Play: Mine Owners vs Miners Negotiations, watch for students assuming the strike was purely ideological.

  Use the primary source quotes provided to ground the role-play in economic grievances, such as the miners’ chant or wage cut demands, and pause the simulation to ask each group to cite evidence from their role card before responding.

• During the Source Analysis Stations: Strike Causes, watch for students interpreting cabinet memos as neutral reports rather than strategic documents.

  Direct students to highlight language in the memos that reveals Baldwin’s calculation, such as phrases about 'withdrawing support' or 'preparing for a showdown,' and hold a whole-class discussion on why these words matter.

• During the Cause-and-Effect Chain: Building Tensions, watch for students isolating miners’ grievances from national issues like export declines.

  Require pairs to explicitly connect the Samuel Commission’s findings to both local coal disputes and broader economic trends by adding a 'national context' label to their chains before presenting.

---

Methods used in this brief

• Structured Academic Controversy