Should Wizard Hit Mommy?: Moral Relativism
Discussing the concept of moral relativism through the differing perspectives of parent and child.
About This Topic
In 'Should Wizard Hit Mommy?' by John Updike, students examine moral relativism through the perspectives of four-year-old Jo and her mother. Jo objects when the mother in Roger Skunk's story insists the wizard restore the skunk's original smell, prioritising societal acceptance over personal happiness. This CBSE Class 12 Vistas lesson from Narratives of Identity and Change encourages students to justify the mother's actions based on parental duties and norms, while questioning if a single 'right' answer exists to the dilemma.
The topic develops skills in literary analysis, empathy, and ethical reasoning, aligning with board exam requirements for critical evaluation of character motivations. Students predict Jo's evolving morality as she matures, connecting the story to real-life family conflicts and cultural expectations in India. Such exploration highlights how identity shapes judgements, preparing students for nuanced discussions in essays and vivas.
Active learning benefits this topic greatly, as debates and role-plays allow students to inhabit opposing views, transforming passive reading into dynamic empathy-building experiences that deepen understanding and retention.
Key Questions
- Justify the mother's actions from her perspective, considering societal norms and parental roles.
- Evaluate whether there is a 'right' answer to the moral dilemma presented in the story.
- Predict how Jo's understanding of morality might evolve as she grows older.
Learning Objectives
- Analyze the mother's actions in 'Should Wizard Hit Mommy?' by identifying the societal norms and parental responsibilities influencing her perspective.
- Evaluate the moral dilemma presented in the story by comparing Jo's and her mother's viewpoints on happiness versus societal acceptance.
- Critique the concept of moral relativism by determining whether a universally 'correct' moral decision exists within the narrative.
- Predict the long-term impact of Jo's evolving understanding of morality on her future relationships and decision-making processes.
- Synthesize the story's themes with real-world scenarios of parental guidance and child development.
Before You Start
Why: Students need to be able to identify and explain the reasons behind characters' actions to understand the differing perspectives in the story.
Why: Comprehending how a story is told from different viewpoints is crucial for grasping the core conflict between Jo and her mother.
Key Vocabulary
| Moral Relativism | The philosophical idea that moral judgments are true or false only relative to some particular standpoint (for instance, that of a culture or a historical period) and that no standpoint is uniquely privileged over all others. |
| Societal Norms | Expected standards of behaviour and beliefs established by a society or group, influencing individual actions and judgments. |
| Parental Role | The set of responsibilities, duties, and expectations associated with raising and guiding a child, often encompassing protection, education, and moral development. |
| Ethical Dilemma | A situation where an individual must choose between two or more conflicting moral principles or values, with no clear 'right' or 'wrong' option. |
Watch Out for These Misconceptions
Common MisconceptionMorality has one absolute right answer, like the mother always being correct.
What to Teach Instead
The story illustrates context-dependent ethics; role-plays help students switch perspectives, revealing no universal 'right' and reducing black-and-white thinking through peer challenges.
Common MisconceptionJo's protest shows immaturity, with no value in questioning parents.
What to Teach Instead
Questioning fosters growth, as predicted in her future; group debates validate Jo's view, helping students appreciate evolving morality via shared stories from their lives.
Common MisconceptionThe wizard's magic solves moral issues permanently.
What to Teach Instead
Magic underscores temporary fixes; chart activities expose ongoing tensions, with active mapping clarifying relativism over simplistic resolutions.
Active Learning Ideas
See all activitiesRole-Play Debate: Jo vs Mother
Assign pairs one as Jo and one as mother; they prepare arguments for 10 minutes using story evidence, then debate for 15 minutes with class as judges voting on persuasiveness. Debrief with reflections on relativism. Follow with whole-class synthesis.
Perspective Chart: Group Mapping
In small groups, students create a T-chart listing pros and cons of mother's and Jo's views with textual quotes. Groups present charts, then merge into a class mind map. End with personal stance statements.
Future Prediction Carousel: Jo's Growth
Individuals write predictions on sticky notes about Jo's morality at age 12; post on stations around room. Small groups rotate, adding responses and evidence from story. Conclude with whole-class vote on most likely evolution.
Jigsaw: Ethics Lenses
Divide class into expert groups on cultural norms, parental roles, child autonomy, and relativism; each researches via story and notes. Regroup to teach peers, building a class ethical framework.
Real-World Connections
- In family law, judges often grapple with moral relativism when deciding custody cases, weighing the 'best interests of the child' against varying cultural practices or parental beliefs, such as in disputes over religious upbringing or disciplinary methods.
- Child psychologists, like those at the National Institute of Mental Health, study how children develop their moral compass, observing how early experiences with parental guidance and peer interactions shape their understanding of right and wrong, influencing their future choices in school and social settings.
Assessment Ideas
Divide students into small groups. Pose the question: 'If you were Jo's mother, would you have insisted the wizard restore Roger Skunk's original smell? Explain your reasoning, referencing at least one societal expectation or parental duty you considered.' Allow groups 10 minutes to discuss before sharing key points with the class.
On a small slip of paper, ask students to write: 1. One reason the mother's action could be considered morally justifiable. 2. One reason Jo's objection could be considered morally valid. 3. A single word that best describes the central conflict of the story.
Present students with a hypothetical scenario similar to the story's dilemma (e.g., a child wants a toy that is deemed 'inappropriate' by the school). Ask students to write down one argument from the 'parent's perspective' and one from the 'child's perspective' in their notebooks. Review a few responses aloud.
Frequently Asked Questions
How to teach moral relativism in Should Wizard Hit Mommy for CBSE Class 12?
What are key themes in Should Wizard Hit Mommy?
How can active learning help students understand moral relativism here?
Best activities for Should Wizard Hit Mommy in Class 12 English?
Planning templates for English
More in Narratives of Identity and Change
The Last Lesson: Language as Resistance
Analyzing the role of mother tongue in preserving identity during political occupation.
2 methodologies
The Last Lesson: Symbolism and Allegory
Deeper analysis of the symbolic elements and allegorical meanings within 'The Last Lesson'.
2 methodologies
Lost Spring: Cycles of Poverty
Examining the socio-economic barriers that prevent marginalized children from achieving their dreams.
2 methodologies
Lost Spring: Child Labor and Exploitation
Focusing on the socio-economic factors leading to child labor and its impact on children's rights.
2 methodologies
Deep Water: Overcoming Internal Fears
A psychological study of fear and the disciplined pursuit of mastery over one's limitations.
2 methodologies
Deep Water: Psychological Resilience
Examining the psychological strategies employed by Douglas to overcome his fear of water.
2 methodologies