Light and Sound · Summer Term

Shadows and Light Blocking

Understanding how shadows are formed when opaque objects block light, and how shadow size and shape can change.

About This Topic

Evaluating Scientific Evidence is the final stage of the scientific process, where students reflect on their work and the work of others. They learn to identify the limitations of their experiments and suggest how they could be improved. This topic is a key part of the KS2 'Working Scientifically' curriculum, requiring students to use relevant scientific language and illustrations to discuss, communicate, and justify their scientific ideas.

This unit is crucial for developing a critical and reflective mindset. It teaches students that science is not just about getting the 'right' answer, but about understanding how reliable that answer is. This topic particularly benefits from hands-on, student-centered approaches like structured debates or peer review sessions, where students must use evidence to support their conclusions and respond to the critiques of others.

Active Learning Ideas

Formal Debate: Can We Trust the Results?

Two groups are given the same set of 'messy' data from an experiment. One group must argue that the results are strong enough to draw a conclusion, while the other must argue that the experiment was too flawed to be trusted, using specific evidence from the data.

⏱ 45 min·Small Groups

Generate mission

Peer Review: The Science Journal

Students swap their final lab reports with a partner. Using a checklist, they provide 'two stars and a wish' (two things done well and one improvement), focusing on whether the conclusion is actually supported by the data provided in the tables and graphs.

⏱ 40 min·Pairs

Generate mission

Think-Pair-Share: If I Did It Again...

After finishing an investigation, students think of one thing that went wrong or could be better. They pair up to brainstorm a specific way to fix that problem (e.g., 'use a digital thermometer instead of a liquid one') and then share their 'improved method' with the class.

⏱ 25 min·Pairs

Generate mission

Watch Out for These Misconceptions

Common Misconception

An experiment is a failure if it doesn't prove your prediction.

What to Teach Instead

Students often feel they 'failed' if their hypothesis was wrong. Through peer discussion, they can learn that 'disproving' a prediction is just as scientifically valuable as 'proving' one, as both provide new information about how the world works.

Common Misconception

Science gives us 100% certain answers.

What to Teach Instead

Children often think science is a collection of absolute facts. By evaluating experiments with small sample sizes or inconsistent results, they learn that scientific conclusions are always based on the *available* evidence and can change as we get better data.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does it mean to 'evaluate' an experiment?

Evaluating means looking back at your work to see what went well and what didn't. You think about whether your test was truly fair, if your measurements were accurate, and if you have enough evidence to be sure of your conclusion. It's about being an honest and critical scientist.

How can I improve my scientific conclusion?

A good conclusion should always refer back to the data. Instead of just saying 'the sugar dissolved faster,' say 'the sugar dissolved 20 seconds faster in the hot water than in the cold water.' Using specific numbers from your results makes your conclusion much stronger and more convincing.

How can active learning help students evaluate evidence?

Evaluation is often the hardest part of science because it requires self-reflection. Active learning, like peer review or structured debates, makes this process social and engaging. When students have to justify their findings to a peer, they naturally start to see the gaps in their own evidence, which is a much more powerful way to learn than just being told their work needs improvement.

What are 'limitations' in a science experiment?

Limitations are things that might have made your results less accurate. This could be anything from using a ruler that was hard to read, to the room temperature changing during the test, or only having time to do the experiment once. Identifying these helps you suggest better ways to do the test next time.

Browse curriculum by country

• Americas
• US
• CA
• MX
• CL
• CO
• BR

• Europe
• UK
• IE
• FR
• DE
• ES
• IT
• NL
• PT
• SE

• Asia & Pacific
• IN
• SG
• AU