Skip to content
Philosophy · Year 12

Active learning ideas

Eating Animals

Eating Animals is a high-stakes topic in Applied Ethics that challenges students' daily habits. They examine the moral status of animals: do they have rights, or are they merely 'resources'? The unit focuses on the application of normative theories to factory farming and meat consumption, with a particular emphasis on Peter Singer's 'Speciesism' and the concept of 'Sentience'.

National Curriculum Attainment TargetsAQA 7172: Moral Philosophy 3.2.2.4
20–35 minPairs → Whole Class3 activities

Activity 01

Formal Debate30 min · Whole Class

Formal Debate: Is Speciesism like Racism?

Based on Peter Singer's work, students debate whether 'species' is a valid moral category or if 'sentience' (the ability to feel pain) is the only thing that should matter for moral consideration.

Do animals have moral rights?
AnalyzeEvaluateCreateSelf-ManagementDecision-Making
Generate Complete Lesson

Activity 02

Gallery Walk35 min · Small Groups

Gallery Walk: Three Perspectives on the Farm

Stations show images/facts about factory farming. Students must write one 'Kantian' response, one 'Utilitarian' response, and one 'Virtue Ethics' response to the data they see.

How does preference utilitarianism approach the suffering of animals?
UnderstandApplyAnalyzeCreateRelationship SkillsSocial Awareness
Generate Complete Lesson

Activity 03

Think-Pair-Share20 min · Pairs

Think-Pair-Share: Indirect Duties

Students discuss Kant's idea that we only treat animals well so we don't 'get into the habit' of being cruel to humans. They share whether this is a satisfying reason to be kind to animals.

Does Kantian ethics allow for the exploitation of non-rational beings?
UnderstandApplyAnalyzeSelf-AwarenessRelationship Skills
Generate Complete Lesson

A few notes on teaching this unit


Watch Out for These Misconceptions

  • Students often think Utilitarians must all be vegans.

    While many are, a Utilitarian might argue that 'humane' farming where animals have happy lives and quick deaths is morally acceptable. Active 'pain vs pleasure' mapping helps students see the nuances in different Utilitarian positions.

  • Students assume Kantian ethics gives animals no protection at all.

    Kant argues we have 'indirect duties' to animals. Peer-led analysis of Kant's 'Lectures on Ethics' helps students see that for Kant, being cruel to a dog is a sign of a bad character, even if the dog has no rights.


Methods used in this brief