Skip to content
The Retreat from Reform 1975-1992 · Spring Term

The Gulf War (1990-91) & British Involvement

Students will examine the Supreme Court's Milliken v. Bradley decision, analyzing how it limited the scope of desegregation efforts to individual school districts.

Key Questions

  1. Analyze how the Milliken v. Bradley decision limited the scope of desegregation.
  2. Explain the legal reasoning behind the Court's ruling.
  3. Predict the long-term impact of this decision on racial segregation in schools.

National Curriculum Attainment Targets

A-Level: History - International Relations, 1945-2003A-Level: History - British Foreign Policy Post-Cold War
Year: Year 13
Subject: History
Unit: The Retreat from Reform 1975-1992
Period: Spring Term

About This Topic

This topic evaluates the legal and social debates surrounding affirmative action, focusing on the landmark Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978) case. Students examine how the concept of 'reverse discrimination' emerged as a powerful political force and how the Supreme Court attempted to balance the goal of diversity with the rights of the individual. The study also covers the expansion of affirmative action in the 1970s and the growing conservative backlash against 'quotas'.

At Year 13, students analyse the impact of affirmative action on the growth of the Black middle class and the internal debates within the African American community about its effectiveness. They consider how the debate intensified during the Reagan era and the shift toward 'colourblind' policies. This topic is best taught through mock trials of the Bakke case and by debating the merits of 'equity' vs. 'equality' in a historically unequal society.

Active Learning Ideas

Watch Out for These Misconceptions

Common MisconceptionAffirmative action means that unqualified people are given jobs or university places.

What to Teach Instead

In most cases, it involves choosing between qualified candidates while considering race as one of many factors to promote diversity. Peer discussion of the 'plus factor' approach helps students understand the nuance of the policy.

Common MisconceptionThe Bakke case ended affirmative action.

What to Teach Instead

The Court actually upheld the use of race as a factor in admissions, while banning the use of rigid racial quotas. Using a station rotation to look at subsequent cases like Grutter v. Bollinger helps students see the ongoing legal evolution of the policy.

Ready to teach this topic?

Generate a complete, classroom-ready active learning mission in seconds.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the Bakke case about?
Allan Bakke, a white applicant, sued the University of California after being denied admission to medical school twice, despite having higher test scores than some minority applicants admitted under a special programme. He argued that the school's use of a racial quota violated his rights under the 14th Amendment.
What did the Supreme Court decide in Bakke?
In a split decision, the Court ruled that the university's specific quota system was unconstitutional. However, it also ruled that race could be used as one of several 'plus factors' in admissions to achieve the goal of a diverse student body, which the Court deemed a 'compelling state interest'.
Why did affirmative action become so controversial in the 1980s?
The policy became a central target of the 'New Right' and the Reagan administration, who argued that it was a form of 'reverse discrimination' that violated the principle of meritocracy. They promoted a 'colourblind' approach to law and policy, which many civil rights activists saw as a way to ignore the ongoing effects of systemic racism.
How can active learning help students understand affirmative action?
Active learning, such as a mock trial of the Bakke case, helps students engage with the complex legal and ethical arguments on both sides. By investigating the impact on the Black middle class, students see the real-world consequences of the policy. This approach helps them move beyond slogans to a deeper understanding of the challenges of achieving true racial equality.

Browse curriculum by country

AmericasUSCAMXCLCOBR
Asia & PacificINSGAU