Skip to content
The Retreat from Reform 1975-1992 · Spring Term

Devolution in the UK: Scotland & Wales

Students will investigate the significance of the 1982 extension of the Voting Rights Act, analyzing the political struggle to preserve this landmark legislation.

Key Questions

  1. Analyze the significance of the 1982 extension of the Voting Rights Act.
  2. Explain the arguments made by proponents and opponents of the extension.
  3. Evaluate the continued importance of the VRA in protecting minority voting rights.

National Curriculum Attainment Targets

A-Level: History - Post-War Britain, 1951-2007A-Level: History - Constitutional Change in Britain
Year: Year 13
Subject: History
Unit: The Retreat from Reform 1975-1992
Period: Spring Term

About This Topic

This topic examines the 1991 Supreme Court confirmation hearings of Clarence Thomas, focusing on the intersection of race, gender, and judicial philosophy. Students analyse the explosive testimony of Anita Hill, who accused Thomas of sexual harassment, and the subsequent national debate about workplace conduct and the credibility of Black women. The hearings highlighted the deep divisions within the African American community over Thomas's conservative views.

At Year 13, students evaluate how the Thomas-Hill case changed the conversation about sexual harassment and led to a surge in women running for political office ('The Year of the Woman'). They also consider Thomas's 'black conservative' philosophy and his rejection of affirmative action. This topic is best explored through collaborative analysis of the hearing transcripts and by debating the 'high-tech lynching' vs. 'sexual harassment' narratives.

Active Learning Ideas

Watch Out for These Misconceptions

Common MisconceptionThe African American community was united in its support for Clarence Thomas.

What to Teach Instead

The community was deeply split; many supported him as a 'success story', while others, including the NAACP, opposed him due to his conservative record. Peer discussion of the 'Thomas vs. Hill' divide helps students see the complexity of racial identity and politics.

Common MisconceptionThe hearings were only about sexual harassment.

What to Teach Instead

They were also a battle over the future of the Supreme Court and the legacy of the civil rights movement. Using a station rotation to look at Thomas's previous rulings helps students see the high-stakes judicial philosophy at the heart of the conflict.

Ready to teach this topic?

Generate a complete, classroom-ready active learning mission in seconds.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is Clarence Thomas?
Clarence Thomas is an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, appointed by George H.W. Bush in 1991 to replace Thurgood Marshall. He is known for his conservative judicial philosophy, including his opposition to affirmative action and his strict interpretation of the Constitution.
What were the Anita Hill hearings?
During Thomas's confirmation, Anita Hill, a law professor who had worked for him, was called to testify about her allegations of sexual harassment. The televised hearings were a national sensation, sparking a massive debate about gender, race, and power in the workplace.
What was the 'Year of the Woman'?
The 1992 election was dubbed the 'Year of the Woman' because a record number of women were elected to Congress. Many were inspired to run by the sight of the all-male Senate Judiciary Committee's dismissive treatment of Anita Hill during the Thomas hearings.
How can active learning help students understand the Clarence Thomas hearings?
Active learning, such as investigating the hearing transcripts, helps students engage with the difficult and sensitive issues of race and gender. By debating Thomas's philosophy, students learn to appreciate the ideological diversity within the Black community. This approach helps them understand the hearings as a pivotal moment in American cultural and political history.

Browse curriculum by country

AmericasUSCAMXCLCOBR
Asia & PacificINSGAU