The final topic in aesthetics examines the complex relationship between art, morality, and society. Students debate whether art should be judged on moral grounds and explore the ethics of censorship. This topic is a key part of the Ontario HZB3M curriculum, as it asks students to analyze the social and political functions of art.
Ontario Curriculum ExpectationsHZB3M F3.1: Evaluate the relationship between aesthetics and moralityHZB3M F3.2: Analyze the social and political functions of art
Students debate a real-world case of a controversial artwork being removed from a Canadian gallery. One side argues for 'artistic autonomy' (art is separate from morals), while the other argues for 'moralism' (art has social duties).
Should art be censored if it is considered offensive?
Groups research a Canadian artist who uses their work for social change (e.g., Kent Monkman or a Francophone protest singer). They present how the art's 'aesthetic' choices help its 'moral' message.
Think-Pair-Share: The 'Bad Person, Good Art' Dilemma
Students reflect on an artist they like who has done something morally wrong. They discuss with a partner: 'Can you still enjoy the art?' and 'Should we stop supporting them?'
Can a morally flawed artwork still be aesthetically valuable?
If a work of art is offensive, it should be banned.
Philosophy explores the difference between 'offensive' and 'harmful,' and looks at the long-term costs of censorship. Active learning that explores the 'slippery slope' of censorship can help students see the complexity of this issue.
Art is just entertainment and doesn't really affect society.
Art can shape our values, empathy, and political views. Peer-led investigations into the history of 'protest art' can help students see the real-world power of aesthetic expression.