Foundations of Canadian Law · Term 2

Sources of Law: Statute, Common, Constitutional

Distinguishing between Statute Law, Common Law, and Constitutional Law as primary sources of Canadian law.

About This Topic

The judiciary is the 'guardian of the Constitution' in Canada, and its independence is a cornerstone of our democracy. In the Ontario curriculum, students analyze the structure of the Canadian court system, from provincial courts to the Supreme Court of Canada. They investigate why it is vital that judges are appointed rather than elected, ensuring they can make decisions based on the law rather than political popularity.

This unit also explores the concept of 'judicial activism' versus 'judicial restraint.' Students debate whether the courts should have the power to strike down laws made by elected officials, particularly in sensitive areas like assisted dying or Indigenous rights. This topic comes alive when students can participate in mock Supreme Court hearings, where they must weigh complex legal arguments and deliver 'judgments' that balance individual rights with the public interest.

Active Learning Ideas

Mock Supreme Court: The Charter Challenge

Students are divided into 'Appellants,' 'Respondents,' and 'Justices.' They must argue a real or hypothetical Charter case (e.g., a ban on a specific type of protest). The Justices must then deliberate and deliver a written 'majority opinion.'

⏱ 90 min·Whole Class

Generate mission

Inquiry Circle: The Path of a Case

Groups are given a legal dispute and must map its journey through the court system, identifying which court has 'jurisdiction' at each stage and why a case might eventually reach the Supreme Court.

⏱ 45 min·Small Groups

Generate mission

Formal Debate: Elected vs. Appointed Judges

Students research the US system (elected judges) and the Canadian system (appointed judges). They debate which system better protects the 'Rule of Law' and prevents political interference in the justice system.

⏱ 50 min·Small Groups

Generate mission

Watch Out for These Misconceptions

Common Misconception

The Supreme Court can just 'pick' any law they don't like and change it.

What to Teach Instead

The Court can only hear cases that are brought to them through the appeals process. A 'Flowchart' activity helps students see that the judiciary is a 'reactive' branch of government, not a proactive one.

Common Misconception

Judges are 'above the law' because they can't be fired easily.

What to Teach Instead

Judicial independence is meant to protect the law, not the judge. Judges must follow strict ethical codes and can be removed for misconduct through a formal process. Peer discussion on 'accountability' can clarify this.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does the role of the judiciary fit into Ontario's Law curriculum?

It is a key part of the 'Legal Foundations' strand. It teaches students about the 'separation of powers' and the crucial role the courts play in interpreting the law and protecting minority rights.

How can active learning help students understand judicial independence?

By simulating a 'political pressure' scenario where a judge is asked to make a popular but illegal decision, students realize why life-tenure and appointments are necessary. It makes the abstract concept of 'independence' a tangible 'shield' for justice.

What is a 'Reference Case'?

It's when the government asks the Supreme Court for its opinion on a legal question (like the legality of secession) before a dispute even happens. It's a unique feature of the Canadian system.

How are Supreme Court Justices chosen in Canada?

They are appointed by the Governor General on the advice of the Prime Minister. There are strict requirements, including regional representation (e.g., three judges must be from Quebec) to ensure a diversity of perspectives.

Browse curriculum by country

• Americas
• US
• CA
• MX
• CL
• CO
• BR

• Europe
• UK
• IE
• FR
• DE
• ES
• IT
• NL
• PT
• SE

• Asia & Pacific
• IN
• SG
• AU