Evolution of Rights: Magna Carta to Charter
Tracing the development of rights from historical documents like the Magna Carta to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Key Questions
- Analyze how the definition of 'rights' has changed over time.
- Explain the significance of the 1982 patriation of the Constitution.
- Compare the protections offered by the Magna Carta with the Canadian Charter.
Ontario Curriculum Expectations
About This Topic
Understanding the sources of law is fundamental to navigating the Canadian legal system. In the Ontario curriculum, students distinguish between three primary sources: Statute Law (laws passed by Parliament or provincial legislatures), Common Law (laws based on previous court decisions, or 'precedent'), and Constitutional Law (the supreme law of the land). They explore how these sources interact and which ones take priority in a conflict.
This unit also highlights Canada's unique 'bijural' system: while most of the country uses Common Law, Quebec maintains a Civil Code for private matters, reflecting its French heritage. Students investigate the principle of 'stare decisis' (to stand by things decided) and how it provides stability while still allowing the law to evolve. This topic is best explored through collaborative investigations into real court cases, where students must identify which source of law is being applied and why.
Active Learning Ideas
Inquiry Circle: Precedent Detective
Groups are given a 'new' legal case and a set of 'past' decisions (precedents). They must determine which past case is most similar and use the principle of 'stare decisis' to predict the outcome of the new case.
Think-Pair-Share: Common Law vs. Civil Code
Pairs compare a short excerpt from the Quebec Civil Code with a Common Law precedent on the same topic (e.g., a contract dispute). They discuss the pros and cons of having 'written rules' versus 'judge-made law.'
Stations Rotation: The Hierarchy of Laws
Stations feature different types of laws (a municipal by-law, a provincial statute, the Charter). Students must rank them in order of 'authority' and explain what happens if a lower law contradicts a higher one.
Watch Out for These Misconceptions
Common MisconceptionJudges just 'make up' the law as they go along in Common Law.
What to Teach Instead
Judges are strictly bound by 'precedent' and the 'Rule of Law.' A 'Mock Trial' activity can help students see that judges must justify their decisions based on existing legal principles and statutes.
Common MisconceptionStatute law is the only 'real' law because it's written down by politicians.
What to Teach Instead
Common Law is equally 'real' and covers many areas (like torts) that aren't fully addressed by statutes. A 'Case Study' on negligence can show students how Common Law fills the gaps left by legislation.
Suggested Methodologies
Ready to teach this topic?
Generate a complete, classroom-ready active learning mission in seconds.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is it important for Ontario students to know the sources of law?
How can active learning help students understand 'stare decisis'?
What is the difference between Public Law and Private Law?
How does the Constitution act as the 'Supreme Law'?
More in Foundations of Canadian Law
The Rule of Law and Legal Principles
Defining the fundamental principles of the Canadian legal system, including the rule of law, presumption of innocence, and due process.
3 methodologies
Sources of Law: Statute, Common, Constitutional
Distinguishing between Statute Law, Common Law, and Constitutional Law as primary sources of Canadian law.
3 methodologies
The Canadian Court System Structure
Mapping the hierarchy and jurisdiction of federal and provincial courts in Canada.
3 methodologies
The Role of the Judiciary: Independence and Interpretation
Analyzing the structure of the court system and the importance of judicial independence and interpretation.
3 methodologies
Indigenous Legal Traditions and Restorative Justice
Exploring the historical and contemporary role of Indigenous laws, restorative justice, and their interaction with Canadian law.
3 methodologies