Skip to content
Political Systems and Governance · Semester 2

Indonesia's New Order: Stability and Development

Studying Suharto's 'New Order' in Indonesia, focusing on its emphasis on political stability and economic development.

Key Questions

  1. Explain the main goals and characteristics of Suharto's 'New Order' government.
  2. Analyze how the New Order prioritized economic growth and national unity.
  3. Assess the methods used by the New Order to maintain political control and social order.

MOE Syllabus Outcomes

MOE: Independent Southeast Asia: Political Structures - Middle School
Level: JC 1
Subject: History
Unit: Political Systems and Governance
Period: Semester 2

About This Topic

This topic examines 'Bureaucratic Authoritarianism,' specifically focusing on Suharto's 'New Order' in Indonesia (1966–1998). Students analyze how the regime combined military control with the expertise of Western-educated technocrats (the 'Berkeley Mafia') to stabilize the economy and achieve rapid development. The curriculum explores the 'dual function' (dwifungsi) of the military, which gave it a permanent role in both security and civil administration.

Students evaluate the trade-offs of the New Order: significant poverty reduction and infrastructure growth versus systemic corruption and the suppression of political dissent. Understanding this model is vital for discussing the 'Asian Miracle' and the role of the state in economic development. This topic comes alive when students can engage in role-plays of the technocratic planning process and the social impact of 'top-down' development.

Active Learning Ideas

Watch Out for These Misconceptions

Common MisconceptionSuharto's regime was a simple military dictatorship.

What to Teach Instead

It was a complex 'bureaucratic' system that relied heavily on civilian technocrats and a state-sponsored political party (Golkar) to maintain its legitimacy. Peer analysis of the 'New Order' structure helps students see this complexity.

Common MisconceptionThe 'New Order' was always corrupt.

What to Teach Instead

While corruption became systemic later on, the early years were characterized by a genuine and successful effort to end hyperinflation and achieve food self-sufficiency. A 'timeline of legitimacy' helps students see how the regime changed over time.

Ready to teach this topic?

Generate a complete, classroom-ready active learning mission in seconds.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the 'Berkeley Mafia'?
The Berkeley Mafia was a group of Indonesian economists educated at the University of California, Berkeley. They were appointed by Suharto to key positions and were responsible for the market-oriented reforms that led to Indonesia's economic growth in the 1970s and 80s.
What does 'dwifungsi' mean?
Dwifungsi, or 'dual function,' was the official doctrine of the Indonesian military under Suharto. It stated that the military had two roles: a socio-political role in the government and a traditional role in national defense.
How did the New Order maintain political control?
The regime used a combination of the 'Golkar' party to win elections, the 'dual function' of the military to control the administration, and the 'Pancasila' ideology to suppress alternative political visions, along with the direct suppression of dissent.
How can active learning help students understand bureaucratic authoritarianism?
By simulating the decision-making process of technocrats, students can see the 'rational' side of authoritarian development. This helps them understand why such regimes can be popular and effective in the short term, while also surfacing the structural flaws that lead to their eventual collapse.

Browse curriculum by country

AmericasUSCAMXCLCOBR
Asia & PacificINSGAU