Indonesia's New Order: Stability and Development
Studying Suharto's 'New Order' in Indonesia, focusing on its emphasis on political stability and economic development.
Key Questions
- Explain the main goals and characteristics of Suharto's 'New Order' government.
- Analyze how the New Order prioritized economic growth and national unity.
- Assess the methods used by the New Order to maintain political control and social order.
MOE Syllabus Outcomes
About This Topic
This topic examines 'Bureaucratic Authoritarianism,' specifically focusing on Suharto's 'New Order' in Indonesia (1966–1998). Students analyze how the regime combined military control with the expertise of Western-educated technocrats (the 'Berkeley Mafia') to stabilize the economy and achieve rapid development. The curriculum explores the 'dual function' (dwifungsi) of the military, which gave it a permanent role in both security and civil administration.
Students evaluate the trade-offs of the New Order: significant poverty reduction and infrastructure growth versus systemic corruption and the suppression of political dissent. Understanding this model is vital for discussing the 'Asian Miracle' and the role of the state in economic development. This topic comes alive when students can engage in role-plays of the technocratic planning process and the social impact of 'top-down' development.
Active Learning Ideas
Simulation Game: The Technocrat's Dilemma
Students act as economic advisors in the 1970s. They must decide how to allocate oil revenues between industrial projects, education, and military spending, while navigating the demands of the 'First Family.'
Think-Pair-Share: The 'Dual Function' of the Military
Students discuss the pros and cons of having military officers serve as governors and CEOs. They reflect on how this might improve efficiency but also lead to corruption and lack of accountability.
Gallery Walk: The New Order's Successes and Failures
Stations feature data on GDP growth and poverty reduction alongside reports on the 'Petrus' killings and the 1997 financial crisis. Students evaluate the long-term sustainability of the New Order model.
Watch Out for These Misconceptions
Common MisconceptionSuharto's regime was a simple military dictatorship.
What to Teach Instead
It was a complex 'bureaucratic' system that relied heavily on civilian technocrats and a state-sponsored political party (Golkar) to maintain its legitimacy. Peer analysis of the 'New Order' structure helps students see this complexity.
Common MisconceptionThe 'New Order' was always corrupt.
What to Teach Instead
While corruption became systemic later on, the early years were characterized by a genuine and successful effort to end hyperinflation and achieve food self-sufficiency. A 'timeline of legitimacy' helps students see how the regime changed over time.
Suggested Methodologies
Ready to teach this topic?
Generate a complete, classroom-ready active learning mission in seconds.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the 'Berkeley Mafia'?
What does 'dwifungsi' mean?
How did the New Order maintain political control?
How can active learning help students understand bureaucratic authoritarianism?
Planning templates for History
5E Model
The 5E Model structures lessons through five phases (Engage, Explore, Explain, Elaborate, and Evaluate), guiding students from curiosity to deep understanding through inquiry-based learning.
unit plannerThematic Unit
Organize a multi-week unit around a central theme or essential question that cuts across topics, texts, and disciplines, helping students see connections and build deeper understanding.
rubricSingle-Point Rubric
Build a single-point rubric that defines only the "meets standard" level, leaving space for teachers to document what exceeded and what fell short. Simple to create, easy for students to understand.
More in Political Systems and Governance
The Rise of Personalistic Rule: Marcos and Suharto
Analyzing the emergence of 'strongman' rule under leaders like Ferdinand Marcos and Suharto, and the decline of early democracies.
3 methodologies
The Singapore Developmental State Model
Analyzing the People's Action Party's (PAP) approach to governance, economic planning, and social engineering.
3 methodologies
People Power: EDSA Revolution (Philippines)
Studying the 1986 EDSA Revolution in the Philippines as a case study of non-violent democratic transition.
3 methodologies
Reformasi in Indonesia (1998)
Examining the 1998 Reformasi movement in Indonesia, leading to Suharto's downfall and democratic reforms.
3 methodologies
Thai Monarchy and Military Coups
Analyzing the unique role of the Thai monarchy as a unifying force amidst frequent military coups and political instability.
3 methodologies