
Animal Studies of Attachment
Reviewing the foundational animal research by Lorenz and Harlow. Students will debate the ethical implications and the generalisability of these findings to human attachment.
TL;DR:Animal studies have provided profound, if controversial, insights into the nature of attachment. Students examine Lorenz's work on imprinting in geese and Harlow's famous experiments with rhesus monkeys. These studies challenged the prevailing 'cupboard love' theory, the idea that infants only attach to those who feed them, and highlighted the critical importance of contact comfort and early social experience.
About This Topic
Animal studies have provided profound, if controversial, insights into the nature of attachment. Students examine Lorenz's work on imprinting in geese and Harlow's famous experiments with rhesus monkeys. These studies challenged the prevailing 'cupboard love' theory, the idea that infants only attach to those who feed them, and highlighted the critical importance of contact comfort and early social experience.
This topic requires students to grapple with the ethics of animal research and the validity of extrapolating animal findings to humans. It also introduces Bowlby's monotropic theory, which was heavily influenced by these animal observations. Understanding this evolutionary perspective helps students see attachment as a survival mechanism.
Students grasp this concept faster through structured discussion and peer explanation where they can debate the ethical 'cost-benefit' analysis of Harlow's research.
Key Questions
- What does imprinting tell us about the critical period for attachment?
- How did Harlow's monkeys demonstrate the importance of contact comfort?
- To what extent can animal studies inform our understanding of human behaviour?
Watch Out for These Misconceptions
Common MisconceptionHarlow's monkeys preferred the wire mother because she had food.
What to Teach Instead
This is the exact opposite of the findings. Harlow showed that monkeys spent significantly more time with the cloth mother, even if the wire mother provided food. Re-examining the 'time spent' graphs helps students see that contact comfort is the primary driver.
Common MisconceptionImprinting is the same as human attachment.
What to Teach Instead
Clarify that imprinting is an instantaneous, survival-based bond in birds, whereas human attachment is a much slower, more complex emotional process. Comparing the timelines of geese versus humans helps students see the difference in complexity.
Active Learning Ideas
See all activities→Formal Debate
The Ethics of Harlow
Divide the class into 'Pro-Research' and 'Animal Rights' teams. They must debate whether the suffering of Harlow's monkeys was justified by the knowledge gained about the importance of emotional care for human infants.
Simulation Game
The Imprinting Process
Use a simple 'follow the leader' activity to demonstrate the concept of a critical period. Discuss how Lorenz's geese followed the first moving object they saw and why this was an evolutionary advantage for survival.
Think-Pair-Share
Generalising to Humans
Students list the similarities and differences between rhesus monkeys and human infants. They then discuss in pairs why we must be cautious when applying Harlow's findings to human attachment policy.
Frequently Asked Questions
What did Lorenz discover about imprinting?
Why was Harlow's research so important for psychology?
What is Bowlby's monotropic theory?
How can active learning help students understand animal studies?
More in Attachment
Caregiver-Infant Interactions
An introduction to the development of attachment, focusing on reciprocity and interactional synchrony. Students will review Schaffer and Emerson's stages of attachment.
8 methodologies
Types of Attachment
Exploring Ainsworth's Strange Situation and the resulting classifications of secure, insecure-avoidant, and insecure-resistant attachment. Students will also look at cultural variations in attachment types.
8 methodologies
Deprivation and Institutionalisation
Analysing Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation and the effects of institutionalisation, drawing heavily on the Romanian orphan studies.
8 methodologies