
Philosophical Scepticism
An introduction to local and global scepticism. Students will differentiate between ordinary doubt and philosophical doubt.
TL;DR:Philosophical Scepticism introduces students to the radical questioning of our knowledge claims. Unlike ordinary doubt, which looks for specific reasons to disbelieve something, philosophical scepticism questions the very possibility of knowledge in certain areas. Students distinguish between local scepticism (focused on specific domains like the future or other minds) and global scepticism (which targets all knowledge of the external world).
About This Topic
Philosophical Scepticism introduces students to the radical questioning of our knowledge claims. Unlike ordinary doubt, which looks for specific reasons to disbelieve something, philosophical scepticism questions the very possibility of knowledge in certain areas. Students distinguish between local scepticism (focused on specific domains like the future or other minds) and global scepticism (which targets all knowledge of the external world).
This topic is essential for developing the critical 'evaluative' skills required by the AQA National Curriculum. It sets the stage for Descartes' foundationalism and the various responses to the 'Sceptical Challenge'. This topic comes alive when students can physically model the patterns of sceptical arguments through 'What if?' scenarios and structured debates.
Key Questions
- What is the purpose of philosophical scepticism?
- How does local scepticism differ from global scepticism?
- Can we ever be certain of anything?
Watch Out for These Misconceptions
Common MisconceptionStudents often think sceptics are just being 'annoying' or 'unrealistic'.
What to Teach Instead
Scepticism is a tool used to test the strength of our justifications. Active learning helps students see that by trying to 'break' our knowledge, we find out what is truly certain and what is just a lucky guess.
Common MisconceptionStudents confuse 'scepticism' with 'cynicism'.
What to Teach Instead
Cynicism is a negative attitude toward people's motives; scepticism is a formal position on the limits of knowledge. Peer-led definitions can help clarify that a sceptic might be a very happy person who just thinks we can't 'prove' the world exists.
Active Learning Ideas
See all activities→Think-Pair-Share
Ordinary vs Philosophical Doubt
Students list three things they doubt today (e.g., the weather forecast) and then try to apply a 'global' doubt to the same things. They discuss why philosophical doubt is harder to dismiss.
Simulation Game
The Brain in a Vat
Students are told they are actually brains in a vat being fed data by a computer. They must try to find one piece of evidence from their current surroundings that proves this is false, discovering the difficulty of defeating global scepticism.
Gallery Walk
Types of Scepticism
Stations are set up for 'Local Scepticism', 'Global Scepticism', and 'Methodological Scepticism'. Students move around to find examples for each and rank them by how 'dangerous' they are to everyday life.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between local and global scepticism?
Why do philosophers use sceptical arguments?
How can active learning help students understand Philosophical Scepticism?
Can you be a sceptic and still live a normal life?
More in Epistemology: The Limits of Knowledge
Descartes' Method of Doubt
Students analyse Descartes' three waves of doubt, including the evil demon hypothesis. They will evaluate the cogito as a foundational truth.
8 methodologies
Empiricist Responses to Scepticism
An examination of how empiricists like Locke, Berkeley, and Russell respond to sceptical challenges. Students will assess the reliability of sense data.
8 methodologies