Skip to content
Philosophy · Year 12

Active learning ideas

Moral Anti-realism

Moral Anti-realism challenges the idea that moral facts exist at all. Students examine two major theories: Emotivism (A.J. Ayer) and Error Theory (J.L. Mackie). Emotivism suggests that moral statements are just expressions of emotion (the 'Boo/Hurrah' theory), while Error Theory argues that while we *try* to speak about objective moral facts, those facts don't exist, making all moral claims false.

National Curriculum Attainment TargetsAQA 7172: Moral Philosophy 3.2.3.2
20–35 minPairs → Whole Class3 activities

Activity 01

Simulation Game20 min · Small Groups

Simulation Game: The Boo/Hurrah Game

Students are given a list of moral statements (e.g., 'Stealing is wrong'). They must 'translate' them into Emotive language (e.g., 'Boo to stealing!'). They then discuss what is 'lost' in this translation.

What does Mackie mean by the 'argument from queerness'?
ApplyAnalyzeEvaluateCreateSocial AwarenessDecision-Making
Generate Complete Lesson

Activity 02

Inquiry Circle35 min · Small Groups

Inquiry Circle: The Argument from Queerness

Groups are asked to imagine what an 'objective moral property' would actually look like. If it's not physical, how does it 'push' us to act? They present their 'Queer Object' to the class to show why Mackie finds them so unlikely.

Are moral statements merely expressions of emotion?
AnalyzeEvaluateCreateSelf-ManagementSelf-Awareness
Generate Complete Lesson

Activity 03

Formal Debate30 min · Whole Class

Formal Debate: The Argument from Relativity

One group uses the fact that different cultures have different morals to prove morality is 'made up' (Anti-realism). The other group argues that there are 'universal' morals underneath the differences (Realism).

Can moral anti-realism account for moral progress?
AnalyzeEvaluateCreateSelf-ManagementDecision-Making
Generate Complete Lesson

A few notes on teaching this unit


Watch Out for These Misconceptions

  • Students often think Emotivism means 'anything goes'.

    Emotivism describes *what we are doing* when we talk about morals; it doesn't necessarily say we should stop having moral feelings. Active 'translation' exercises help students see that Emotivism is a theory of language, not a recommendation for behavior.

  • Students think Mackie's 'Error Theory' says we should all be evil.

    Mackie says our *claims* to objectivity are an error, not that the *actions* themselves don't matter to us. Peer-led discussion on 'useful fictions' can help students understand how we can have morality without 'facts'.


Methods used in this brief