Law · Year 13

Active learning ideas

The Tort of Negligence

Negligence is the cornerstone of modern tort law, dealing with civil wrongs that result in harm or loss. For Year 13 students, the focus is on the three-part test: duty of care, breach of duty, and damage. Students must move beyond the 'neighbour principle' from Donoghue v Stevenson to understand the modern application of the Caparo test and the clarifying principles in Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire.

• National Curriculum Attainment Targets
• AQA Law 4.2.1
• OCR Law H415/02

• 25–45 min
• Pairs → Whole Class
• 3 activities

Activity 01

• Stations Rotation
• 45 min · Small Groups

Stations Rotation: The Reasonable Person

Set up stations for different 'defendants': a learner driver (Nettleship v Weston), a surgeon (Bolam), and a teenager (Mullin v Richards). Students move between stations to define the specific standard of care required for each and identify why the law treats them differently.

How is a duty of care established using the Caparo test and Robinson principles?

• Remember
• Understand
• Apply
• Analyze
• Self-Management
• Relationship Skills

Activity 02

• Inquiry Circle
• 40 min · Small Groups

Inquiry Circle: The Caparo Test

Groups are given 'novel' scenarios, such as a local council failing to maintain a park. They must apply the three-stage Caparo test (foreseeability, proximity, and fair/just/reasonable) to determine if a duty of care should be established, using Robinson to check if a precedent already exists.

What constitutes a breach of duty by the reasonable person?

• Analyze
• Evaluate
• Create
• Self-Management
• Self-Awareness

Activity 03

• Think-Pair-Share
• 25 min · Pairs

Think-Pair-Share: Remoteness of Damage

Students read the facts of The Wagon Mound and a scenario involving a 'thin skull' rule (Smith v Leech Brain). They pair up to explain why the fire was too remote in one case, but the cancer was not in the other, then share their logic with the class.

How are causation and remoteness of damage proven in civil courts?

• Understand
• Apply
• Analyze
• Self-Awareness
• Relationship Skills

A few notes on teaching this unit

---

Watch Out for These Misconceptions

• The Caparo test must be used in every single negligence case.

  Following Robinson, the Caparo test is only for 'novel' situations where no precedent exists. If a duty already exists in law (like doctor to patient), you don't need Caparo. Peer teaching helps students learn to check for existing precedents first.

• A learner driver is judged by a lower standard because they are learning.

  In Nettleship v Weston, the court ruled that a learner is judged by the standard of a competent, experienced driver. Using a 'courtroom debate' helps students understand the policy reason: protecting the public outweighs the learner's lack of skill.

---

Methods used in this brief

• Stations Rotation
• Inquiry Circle
• Think-Pair-Share