Law · Year 13

Active learning ideas

Murder and Voluntary Manslaughter

This topic explores the most serious fatal offences in English law, focusing on the specific legal requirements for a murder conviction. Students examine the actus reus, including the 'queen's peace' and causation, alongside the mens rea of malice aforethought. The curriculum requires a deep understanding of how the law distinguishes between express and implied malice, particularly the intention to cause grievous bodily harm.

• National Curriculum Attainment Targets
• AQA Law 4.1.4.1
• OCR Law H415/01

• 20–60 min
• Pairs → Whole Class
• 3 activities

Activity 01

• Mock Trial
• 60 min · Whole Class

Mock Trial: The Partial Defence

Students are assigned roles in a trial where the defendant admits the killing but claims diminished responsibility. They must use medical reports and witness statements to argue whether the defendant's mental functioning was substantially impaired. This requires applying the four-stage test from the Coroners and Justice Act 2009.

What constitutes the actus reus and mens rea of murder?

• Analyze
• Evaluate
• Create
• Decision-Making
• Social Awareness

Activity 02

• Inquiry Circle
• 45 min · Small Groups

Inquiry Circle: Omissions and Duty

Small groups are given different scenarios involving a failure to act, such as a parent failing to feed a child or a doctor stopping treatment. They must research case law like Gibbons and Proctor to determine if a duty of care existed and if the omission constitutes the actus reus of murder. Groups then present their findings to the class.

How do the partial defences of loss of control and diminished responsibility alter a murder charge?

• Analyze
• Evaluate
• Create
• Self-Management
• Self-Awareness

Activity 03

• Think-Pair-Share
• 20 min · Pairs

Think-Pair-Share: The 'GBH Rule'

Individually, students consider whether it is fair that an intent to cause serious harm (implied malice) is sufficient for a murder conviction. They pair up to compare their views with the ruling in Vickers, then share their conclusions with the class to debate potential law reform.

When can an omission lead to liability for murder?

• Understand
• Apply
• Analyze
• Self-Awareness
• Relationship Skills

A few notes on teaching this unit

---

Watch Out for These Misconceptions

• Murder requires a specific intent to kill.

  Under English law, the mens rea for murder is 'malice aforethought,' which includes the intent to cause grievous bodily harm. Peer discussion of the case R v Vickers helps students realise that a defendant can be guilty of murder even if they did not intend to end a life.

• Loss of control is the same as the old 'provocation' defence.

  The Coroners and Justice Act 2009 replaced provocation with loss of control, introducing stricter requirements like the 'qualifying trigger.' Using a comparison table in small groups helps students identify that sexual infidelity alone can no longer be a trigger.

---

Methods used in this brief

• Mock Trial
• Inquiry Circle
• Think-Pair-Share