Activity 01
Debate Pairs: Top-Down vs Bottom-Up
Pair students to prepare 3-minute arguments for one approach using case studies like Docklands (top-down) or Frome (bottom-up). Switch roles to rebut, then vote class-wide on most convincing. Debrief with effectiveness criteria.
Compare the effectiveness of top-down versus bottom-up approaches to urban regeneration.
Facilitation TipFor Debate Pairs, assign clear roles (e.g., government official, community leader) and provide a structured argument framework to keep the discussion focused on regeneration criteria.
What to look forPresent students with two contrasting case studies: one top-down (e.g., Docklands redevelopment in London) and one bottom-up (e.g., a specific community housing project). Ask them: 'Which approach appears more equitable in the long term, and what evidence supports your claim?'