Skip to content

Other Trade BarriersActivities & Teaching Strategies

Active learning helps students grasp the complex effects of non-tariff barriers by making abstract policies concrete. Role-playing subsidies, analyzing real quotas, or debating embargoes turns economic theory into lived experience. These methods show how trade barriers shape prices, jobs, and relationships between nations in ways that lectures cannot.

Grade 9Economics4 activities35 min50 min

Learning Objectives

  1. 1Explain how quotas, embargoes, and voluntary export restraints function as non-tariff barriers to international trade.
  2. 2Analyze the economic impact of domestic subsidies on the competitiveness of Canadian industries in global markets.
  3. 3Evaluate the effectiveness and ethical implications of using trade embargoes as a foreign policy tool.
  4. 4Compare and contrast the effects of tariff and non-tariff barriers on consumer prices and product availability in Canada.

Want a complete lesson plan with these objectives? Generate a Mission

45 min·Small Groups

Simulation Game: Subsidy Trade Talks

Divide class into country teams; one team receives a subsidy card lowering costs. Teams negotiate export deals, tracking price changes and market shares on worksheets. Debrief on how subsidies shift competition.

Prepare & details

Explain how non-tariff barriers can restrict international trade.

Facilitation Tip: In the Subsidy Trade Talks simulation, give each group a fixed subsidy amount but vary their domestic production costs to show how support changes competitiveness.

Setup: Flexible space for group stations

Materials: Role cards with goals/resources, Game currency or tokens, Round tracker

ApplyAnalyzeEvaluateCreateSocial AwarenessDecision-Making
35 min·Pairs

Case Study Analysis: Dairy Quotas Analysis

Provide articles on Canada's dairy supply management. Pairs identify quota effects on trade, chart pros and cons for consumers and farmers, then share findings class-wide.

Prepare & details

Analyze the impact of domestic subsidies on global competition.

Facilitation Tip: For the Dairy Quotas Analysis, provide actual Canadian quota data so students calculate price differences between protected and imported dairy products.

Setup: Groups at tables with case materials

Materials: Case study packet (3-5 pages), Analysis framework worksheet, Presentation template

AnalyzeEvaluateCreateDecision-MakingSelf-Management
40 min·Whole Class

Formal Debate: Embargo Impacts

Assign pro and con positions on a real embargo, like against Russia. Teams prepare evidence for 10 minutes, debate for 20, vote on effectiveness with justifications.

Prepare & details

Critique the use of trade barriers as a tool for political leverage.

Facilitation Tip: During the Embargo Impacts debate, assign roles like farmers, consumers, and policymakers to ensure students consider multiple perspectives in their arguments.

Setup: Two teams facing each other, audience seating for the rest

Materials: Debate proposition card, Research brief for each side, Judging rubric for audience, Timer

AnalyzeEvaluateCreateSelf-ManagementDecision-Making
50 min·Individual

Regulation Mapping Activity

Students research product regulations blocking imports, such as EU bans on hormone-treated beef. Individually map barriers on a world trade diagram, then compare in groups.

Prepare & details

Explain how non-tariff barriers can restrict international trade.

Facilitation Tip: In the Regulation Mapping Activity, have students compare safety standards for imported toys from Mexico and China to identify hidden trade barriers.

Setup: Groups at tables with case materials

Materials: Case study packet (3-5 pages), Analysis framework worksheet, Presentation template

AnalyzeEvaluateCreateDecision-MakingSelf-Management

Teaching This Topic

Experienced teachers avoid presenting non-tariff barriers as purely technical rules. Instead, they connect these policies to real people: farmers losing markets, consumers paying higher prices, or workers facing job losses. Using simulations and debates builds empathy while reinforcing economic reasoning. Research suggests active methods improve retention of complex topics like this by up to 30% compared to lectures.

What to Expect

Students will explain how subsidies, regulations, and embargoes influence trade flows and prices. They will use evidence to argue their impacts on different stakeholders and connect examples to wider economic principles. Success looks like clear reasoning, measured trade-offs, and collaborative problem-solving during activities.

These activities are a starting point. A full mission is the experience.

  • Complete facilitation script with teacher dialogue
  • Printable student materials, ready for class
  • Differentiation strategies for every learner
Generate a Mission

Watch Out for These Misconceptions

Common MisconceptionDuring the Dairy Quotas Analysis activity, watch for students assuming all non-tariff barriers are minor hindrances.

What to Teach Instead

Use the quota data to calculate price differences between Canadian and imported dairy products, then ask groups to present how quotas create artificial scarcity and higher costs for consumers.

Common MisconceptionDuring the Subsidy Trade Talks simulation, watch for students believing subsidies only help the economy.

What to Teach Instead

After each round, have groups recalculate their export prices and domestic sales to show how subsidies distort global prices and invite retaliation from trading partners.

Common MisconceptionDuring the Embargo Impacts debate, watch for students assuming embargoes always succeed in changing political behavior.

What to Teach Instead

Use historical cases like U.S. sanctions on Cuba to guide students in weighing economic losses against policy goals, then ask them to revise arguments based on evidence.

Assessment Ideas

Discussion Prompt

After the Subsidy Trade Talks simulation, pose the question: 'How might Canada’s supply management system in dairy affect trade relations with the U.S. and EU?' Facilitate a class discussion where students present arguments for each stakeholder group.

Quick Check

During the Regulation Mapping Activity, present students with three scenarios: (1) a ban on imported apples due to pesticide levels, (2) a government grant to local apple growers, and (3) a limit on the number of apple varieties allowed for sale. Ask students to identify which type of non-tariff barrier each scenario represents and explain why.

Exit Ticket

After the Embargo Impacts debate, ask students to write down one example of a non-tariff barrier they learned about today. Then, have them explain in one sentence how this barrier could impact international trade between Canada and another country.

Extensions & Scaffolding

  • Challenge: Ask students to research a current non-tariff barrier in Canada’s trade agreements and present how it aligns with or conflicts with free trade principles.
  • Scaffolding: Provide a partially completed table for the Regulation Mapping Activity with some standard categories filled in to guide comparisons.
  • Deeper: Have students interview a local business owner about their experience with import regulations or subsidies and present findings to the class.

Key Vocabulary

SubsidyA direct or indirect payment from the government to domestic producers, intended to lower their costs and make them more competitive.
QuotaA government-imposed limit on the quantity of a specific good that can be imported into a country during a certain period.
EmbargoA complete ban on trade with a particular country, often imposed for political reasons.
Voluntary Export Restraint (VER)An agreement between an exporting country and an importing country where the exporting country limits the quantity of its exports to the importing country.
RegulationA rule or directive made and maintained by an authority, which can act as a barrier if it creates specific standards for imported goods that are difficult or costly to meet.

Ready to teach Other Trade Barriers?

Generate a full mission with everything you need

Generate a Mission