Economics · Grade 10

Active learning ideas

Arguments for and Against Trade

Active learning builds critical thinking about trade policies by letting students experience the tension between competing economic goals. When students debate or simulate tariff impacts, they confront real trade-offs that textbook explanations often flatten into abstractions.

• Ontario Curriculum Expectations
• HS.EC.5.2
• HS.EC.5.3

• 35–50 min
• Pairs → Whole Class
• 4 activities

Activity 01

• Formal Debate
• 45 min · Pairs

Debate Prep: Pro-Free Trade vs. Protectionism

Assign pairs one side: free trade or protectionism. Provide articles on infant industries and consumer benefits. Pairs outline three key arguments with evidence, then present to the class for rebuttals. Conclude with a class vote on the stronger case.

Evaluate the economic benefits of free trade for consumers and producers.

Facilitation Tip

For the Stakeholder Role-Play, provide role cards with conflicting priorities to force students to negotiate trade-offs.

What to look for

Pose the following question to small groups: 'Imagine Canada is considering a new tariff on imported solar panels. What are two potential benefits for Canadian solar panel manufacturers and two potential drawbacks for Canadian consumers? Be prepared to share your group's conclusions.'

• Analyze
• Evaluate
• Create
• Self-Management
• Decision-Making

Activity 02

• Simulation Game
• 35 min · Small Groups

Simulation Game: Tariff Impact Game

Divide class into producers, consumers, and government. Distribute 'goods' cards with costs. Introduce tariffs, adjust prices, and track budget changes over three rounds. Groups discuss winners and losers after each round.

Analyze the arguments for trade protectionism, such as infant industries or national security.

What to look for

Provide students with a short case study describing a fictional country implementing an import quota on textiles. Ask them to write two sentences explaining who might benefit from this policy and two sentences explaining who might be negatively affected.

• Apply
• Analyze
• Evaluate
• Create
• Social Awareness
• Decision-Making

Activity 03

• Case Study Analysis
• 50 min · Small Groups

Case Study Analysis: Canadian Steel Tariffs

Provide excerpts on 2018 steel tariffs. In small groups, students chart effects on jobs, prices, and exports using provided data tables. Groups share findings in a whole-class gallery walk.

Compare the impact of tariffs and quotas on domestic industries and consumers.

What to look for

On an index card, have students define one key term (e.g., tariff, quota) in their own words and then provide one specific example of how it could impact a Canadian industry or consumer.

• Analyze
• Evaluate
• Create
• Decision-Making
• Self-Management

Activity 04

• Formal Debate
• 40 min · Small Groups

Stakeholder Role-Play: Trade Negotiation

Assign roles like union leader, exporter, or consumer advocate. Groups negotiate a trade deal, justifying positions with economic arguments. Debrief on compromises reached.

Evaluate the economic benefits of free trade for consumers and producers.

What to look for

Pose the following question to small groups: 'Imagine Canada is considering a new tariff on imported solar panels. What are two potential benefits for Canadian solar panel manufacturers and two potential drawbacks for Canadian consumers? Be prepared to share your group's conclusions.'

• Analyze
• Evaluate
• Create
• Self-Management
• Decision-Making

A few notes on teaching this unit

Experienced teachers approach trade policy by making abstract economic theories concrete through role-play and simulation. Focus on guiding students to balance efficiency with equity, using real-world cases to help them see that policy decisions rarely have perfect solutions. Avoid presenting trade-offs as either/or dilemmas; instead, emphasize how policies redistribute costs and benefits across society.

Students will move beyond memorizing definitions to weigh evidence, anticipate unintended consequences, and articulate trade-offs from multiple perspectives. Successful learning is visible when students justify their positions with data and adjust their views after hearing counterarguments.

---

Watch Out for These Misconceptions

• During Debate Prep, watch for students assuming free trade benefits everyone equally without examining losers in import-competing industries.

  After assigning roles, pause the debate to ask each side to identify at least one group harmed by their position, using evidence from the case studies provided.

• During the Tariff Impact Game, watch for students believing tariffs protect jobs without raising prices.

  During the debrief, have students calculate the net price change for consumers after accounting for tariffs and retaliatory tariffs from trade partners.

• During the Case Study on Canadian Steel Tariffs, watch for students assuming protectionism always strengthens the economy.

  In small groups, have students compare employment and price data from before and after the tariffs, then present one finding that challenges the assumption of universal benefit.

---

Methods used in this brief

• Formal Debate
• Simulation Game
• Case Study Analysis