Canadian & World Studies · Grade 12

Active learning ideas

Global Trade & Economic Blocs

Active learning works well for this topic because students need to wrestle with complex, real-world decisions where trade-offs and competing values are visible. Simulations and debates let students experience the tensions of foreign policy firsthand, making abstract concepts like national interest and economic blocs feel immediate and personal.

• Ontario Curriculum Expectations
• ON: Global Economic Issues - Grade 12
• ON: International Relations and Global Governance - Grade 12

• 25–60 min
• Pairs → Whole Class
• 3 activities

Activity 01

• Simulation Game
• 60 min · Small Groups

Simulation Game: National Security Council Briefing

Students act as advisors (military, diplomatic, economic) to the Prime Minister during a crisis, such as a cyberattack or a maritime dispute in the Arctic. They must present competing options and recommend a course of action that protects Canada's interests.

Assess whether free trade benefits all Canadians equally.

Facilitation Tip

During the National Security Council Briefing simulation, assign clear roles with varying perspectives (e.g., defense, environment, industry) to ensure students experience policy trade-offs directly.

What to look for

Facilitate a class debate on the statement: 'Free trade agreements like CUSMA/USMCA primarily benefit large corporations and harm small Canadian businesses.' Ask students to cite specific examples and economic principles to support their arguments.

• Apply
• Analyze
• Evaluate
• Create
• Social Awareness
• Decision-Making

Activity 02

• Inquiry Circle
• 45 min · Small Groups

Inquiry Circle: Canada-US Relations

Small groups research a specific area of cooperation or conflict between Canada and the US (e.g., the border, energy, or defense). They create a 'Relationship Scorecard' that highlights the key issues and the level of tension in each area.

Explain how trade wars impact global stability and economic relations.

Facilitation Tip

For the Canada-US Relations investigation, have students map key trade flows on a shared diagram so the economic stakes of policy choices become visible.

What to look for

Present students with a hypothetical scenario where two countries impose retaliatory tariffs on each other's key exports. Ask them to write a short paragraph explaining the likely impact on global supply chains and consumer prices, referencing concepts like trade wars and the WTO.

• Analyze
• Evaluate
• Create
• Self-Management
• Self-Awareness

Activity 03

• Think-Pair-Share
• 25 min · Pairs

Think-Pair-Share: Idealism vs. Realism

Students are given a scenario where a major trading partner is accused of human rights abuses. They discuss with a partner whether Canada should prioritize its economic interests (realism) or its commitment to human rights (idealism) and what the consequences of each choice would be.

Predict the future of globalization in an increasingly protectionist world.

Facilitation Tip

In the Think-Pair-Share on idealism vs. realism, provide a specific historical case (e.g., Canada’s response to the 2003 Iraq War) to anchor the discussion in concrete choices.

What to look for

On an index card, have students define one key term (e.g., protectionism, trade deficit) in their own words and then explain one way it could affect the Canadian economy.

• Understand
• Apply
• Analyze
• Self-Awareness
• Relationship Skills

A few notes on teaching this unit

Teachers should emphasize that foreign policy is not a matter of right or wrong answers but of weighing competing priorities. Use structured debates and simulations to show how different groups inside a country may advocate for different policies, building empathy for complex decision-making. Avoid oversimplifying by presenting any single issue as universally agreed upon among experts or policymakers.

Successful learning looks like students applying course concepts to specific scenarios, citing evidence from policy examples, and recognizing that foreign policy is shaped by multiple perspectives. Students should move from general statements to specific arguments, showing awareness of how geography, economics, and politics interact.

---

Watch Out for These Misconceptions

• During the Collaborative Investigation on Canada-US Relations, watch for students assuming that close allies automatically share the same foreign policy goals.

  Use the trade flow maps and policy case studies from this activity to highlight moments when Canada diverged from the US, such as on trade with China or participation in the Iraq War.

• During the Think-Pair-Share on Idealism vs. Realism, watch for students treating ‘national interest’ as a fixed, uncontested concept.

  Have students use the stakeholder analysis framework provided in the activity to identify conflicting domestic priorities, such as regional economic needs or cultural values, and explain how these shape policy debates.

---

Methods used in this brief

• Simulation Game
• Inquiry Circle
• Think-Pair-Share