Women in the Workforce & Pay EquityActivities & Teaching Strategies
Active learning helps students move beyond abstract facts about policy changes to see how real people shaped workplace rights. When they analyze primary documents or debate historical impacts, they connect the Royal Commission’s recommendations to lived experiences of discrimination and progress.
Learning Objectives
- 1Analyze the impact of World War I and World War II on women's entry into traditionally male-dominated industries in Canada.
- 2Explain the concept of pay equity and identify specific legislative efforts in Canada to address the gender pay gap.
- 3Evaluate the effectiveness of policies and social movements in advancing women's workplace equality since the 1960s.
- 4Compare the types of barriers women faced in the workforce in the mid-20th century versus contemporary challenges.
Want a complete lesson plan with these objectives? Generate a Mission →
Inquiry Circle: The 1970 Royal Commission
In small groups, students analyze a selection of the 167 recommendations from the Royal Commission on the Status of Women. They identify which recommendations have been fulfilled and which issues (like affordable childcare) remain ongoing challenges today.
Prepare & details
Analyze how the World Wars significantly altered women's participation in the workforce.
Facilitation Tip: During the Collaborative Investigation, assign each small group one recommendation from the Royal Commission and have them map it to a law passed within five years.
Setup: Groups at tables with access to source materials
Materials: Source material collection, Inquiry cycle worksheet, Question generation protocol, Findings presentation template
Formal Debate: The Impact of the 'Pill'
Students debate how the introduction of the birth control pill in the 1960s changed women's lives in terms of education, career, and family planning. They discuss the social and economic consequences of women having more control over their reproductive lives.
Prepare & details
Explain the persistent barriers women face in achieving workplace equality today.
Facilitation Tip: For the Structured Debate on the Pill, provide students with two primary sources: a 1960s medical journal article and a feminist magazine piece to ground arguments in historical voices.
Setup: Two teams facing each other, audience seating for the rest
Materials: Debate proposition card, Research brief for each side, Judging rubric for audience, Timer
Think-Pair-Share: The Morgentaler Case
Students read about Dr. Henry Morgentaler's long legal battle for abortion rights. They discuss with a partner the significance of the 1988 Supreme Court decision and how it reflected the changing values of Canadian society regarding women's autonomy.
Prepare & details
Evaluate the progress and challenges in the fight for pay equity in Canada.
Facilitation Tip: In the Think-Pair-Share on the Morgentaler Case, ask students to jot down one legal and one social change that followed the decision before sharing.
Setup: Standard classroom seating; students turn to a neighbor
Materials: Discussion prompt (projected or printed), Optional: recording sheet for pairs
Teaching This Topic
Teachers should avoid presenting second-wave feminism as a monolithic success story. Instead, use primary sources to show internal debates about who the movement included and excluded. Research suggests pairing historical policy wins with counter-stories of marginalized women to deepen understanding of intersectionality. Avoid framing early feminism as solely oppositional; highlight coalitions with labor groups and Indigenous activists that strengthened policy demands.
What to Expect
Successful learning looks like students confidently linking specific Royal Commission recommendations to laws passed, debating the Pill’s effects with historical evidence, and recognizing how legal cases like Morgentaler shifted cultural and policy boundaries. Their discussions should show depth, not just agreement with feminist aims.
These activities are a starting point. A full mission is the experience.
- Complete facilitation script with teacher dialogue
- Printable student materials, ready for class
- Differentiation strategies for every learner
Watch Out for These Misconceptions
Common MisconceptionDuring the Collaborative Investigation on the Royal Commission, watch for students assuming the 167 recommendations were all immediately adopted.
What to Teach Instead
Use the activity’s source packets to have students track which recommendations became law within five years and which stalled, then discuss why some faced resistance.
Common MisconceptionDuring the Structured Debate on the Impact of the 'Pill', students may reduce the movement’s goals to personal liberation rather than systemic change.
What to Teach Instead
Have debaters cite specific policy outcomes tied to the Pill, like changes in divorce laws or workplace protections, using the debate sources as evidence.
Assessment Ideas
After the Structured Debate on the Pill, pose this question: 'What does the distinction between personal choice and systemic rights reveal about the limitations of focusing only on access to birth control?' Facilitate a class discussion where students evaluate the debate’s arguments.
During the Collaborative Investigation, provide students with a short excerpt from a 1970s newspaper article about pay discrimination. Ask them to identify two barriers mentioned and suggest one policy from the Royal Commission that could address them.
After the Think-Pair-Share on the Morgentaler Case, have students write an exit card naming one legal precedent set by the case and one ongoing challenge in reproductive rights that connects to pay equity today.
Extensions & Scaffolding
- Challenge students who finish early to research how a specific Royal Commission recommendation was either adopted, modified, or ignored, and present a 3-minute 'policy autopsy' to the class.
- Scaffolding for struggling students: Provide sentence starters for the debate, such as 'One impact of the Pill was...' and 'A counterpoint is...' to structure their arguments.
- Deeper exploration: Have students interview a community member over 50 about how workplace policies for women have changed since the 1970s and present findings in a mini-documentary format.
Key Vocabulary
| Pay Equity | The principle of equal pay for work of equal value, aiming to address systemic gender-based discrimination in compensation. |
| Glass Ceiling | An invisible barrier that prevents women and other minority groups from rising to the highest levels of leadership and management in organizations. |
| Occupational Segregation | The concentration of men and women in different types of jobs, often with women in lower-paying roles and sectors. |
| Equal Pay for Equal Work | Legislation requiring that men and women receive the same pay for performing the exact same job. |
Suggested Methodologies
More in Women's Rights & Social Change
The Suffrage Movement in Canada
Students examine the Canadian women's suffrage movement and the uneven path to voting rights.
3 methodologies
Second-Wave Feminism & Reproductive Rights
The Royal Commission on the Status of Women and the fight for reproductive rights.
3 methodologies
Gender Equality Today & Intersectional Feminism
Assessing the current state of gender equality and intersectional feminism.
3 methodologies
Ready to teach Women in the Workforce & Pay Equity?
Generate a full mission with everything you need
Generate a Mission