The Power of the EditorialActivities & Teaching Strategies
Active learning works because editorial writing demands students step into a public voice, and that voice strengthens through doing, not just listening. When students draft, debate, and revise in real time, they move from passive readers to active advocates who see how evidence shapes opinion.
Learning Objectives
- 1Analyze the use of specific persuasive devices (e.g., repetition, anecdote, expert testimony) in published editorials to support a social change argument.
- 2Evaluate the effectiveness of inclusive language ('we', 'us') in building reader connection and credibility within an editorial.
- 3Create an editorial advocating for a specific social change, incorporating evidence and at least two distinct persuasive devices.
- 4Critique a peer's editorial draft, identifying strengths and weaknesses in argument structure, evidence use, and persuasive technique.
- 5Explain how acknowledging a counter-argument strengthens an editorial's overall position without undermining its primary claim.
Want a complete lesson plan with these objectives? Generate a Mission →
Mock Trial: The Editorial Board
The class acts as an editorial board for a major newspaper. Students must pitch their editorial topics to the 'Editor-in-Chief' (the teacher or a student), justifying why their issue is urgent and what specific change they are calling for.
Prepare & details
How does the use of inclusive language like 'we' and 'us' build a connection with the reader?
Facilitation Tip: During the Mock Trial, assign roles beforehand (editor-in-chief, researcher, rebuttal writer) to ensure every student contributes a specific task.
Setup: Desks rearranged into courtroom layout
Materials: Role cards, Evidence packets, Verdict form for jury
Inquiry Circle: The 'We' Factor
In pairs, students take a formal, detached argument and rewrite it using inclusive language and rhetorical questions. They then swap with another pair to see which version feels more persuasive and personal.
Prepare & details
What is the effect of using a rhetorical question as a concluding statement in an argument?
Facilitation Tip: In the Collaborative Investigation, provide a graphic organizer with columns for claims, evidence, and audience connections to guide student thinking.
Setup: Groups at tables with access to source materials
Materials: Source material collection, Inquiry cycle worksheet, Question generation protocol, Findings presentation template
Gallery Walk: Argument Mapping
Students post their editorial drafts on the walls. Peers move around with different colored markers to highlight the 'hook,' the 'evidence,' and the 'call to action,' providing feedback on which parts were most compelling.
Prepare & details
How can a writer acknowledge a counter-argument without weakening their own position?
Facilitation Tip: For the Gallery Walk, place argument maps at eye level and number them so students can reference them during discussions.
Setup: Wall space or tables arranged around room perimeter
Materials: Large paper/poster boards, Markers, Sticky notes for feedback
Teaching This Topic
Teach editorial writing by modeling how to turn opinion into argument through layered evidence. Avoid treating it as opinion writing alone; insist on credible sources and clear rebuttals. Research shows students write stronger editorials when they first analyze published examples for structure and tone, not just content.
What to Expect
Successful learning looks like students using authoritative language, integrating credible evidence, and addressing counter-arguments in their drafts. They should show confidence in their stance while remaining open to reasoned debate.
These activities are a starting point. A full mission is the experience.
- Complete facilitation script with teacher dialogue
- Printable student materials, ready for class
- Differentiation strategies for every learner
Watch Out for These Misconceptions
Common MisconceptionDuring the Mock Trial, watch for students who dismiss counter-arguments as 'wrong' instead of engaging with them.
What to Teach Instead
Use the Mock Trial’s rebuttal phase to ask teams to respond to at least one counter-claim with evidence, modeling how credible editorials build authority by addressing opposing views.
Common MisconceptionDuring the Collaborative Investigation, watch for students who assume including a counter-argument weakens their position.
What to Teach Instead
In the Collaborative Investigation, have pairs highlight where acknowledging the other side actually strengthens the main claim, using the 'We' factor graphic organizer to track audience connection and credibility.
Assessment Ideas
After the Mock Trial, provide students with a short published editorial to analyze for inclusive language and persuasive devices, then collect responses to assess their ability to identify rhetorical strategies.
During the Collaborative Investigation, have students exchange drafts and use the checklist to evaluate clarity, evidence, and counter-arguments, then provide one specific suggestion for improvement.
After the Gallery Walk, present three different concluding sentences and ask students to vote on the most effective one, then briefly explain their choice in writing.
Extensions & Scaffolding
- Challenge: Ask students to revise their editorial for a different audience (e.g., parents, local council) and compare how tone and evidence change.
- Scaffolding: Provide sentence starters for rebuttals (e.g., 'While some argue..., evidence shows...') and pre-selected articles with clear claims.
- Deeper exploration: Invite a local journalist or community advocate to give feedback on student drafts and discuss how editorials influence real decisions.
Key Vocabulary
| Editorial | A newspaper or magazine article that gives the opinions of the editors or publishers. It often advocates for a particular viewpoint or social change. |
| Persuasive Devices | Techniques used by writers to convince an audience to agree with their point of view. Examples include rhetorical questions, repetition, and appeals to emotion. |
| Inclusive Language | Words and phrases that avoid bias and stereotypes, such as using 'we' or 'us' to create a sense of shared identity and purpose with the reader. |
| Counter-argument | An argument or set of reasons put forward to oppose an idea or theory developed in another argument. Acknowledging it can strengthen one's own position. |
| Social Change | Significant alterations over time in behavior patterns, cultural values, and norms within a society. Editorials often aim to influence or advocate for such changes. |
Suggested Methodologies
Planning templates for English
More in Persuasion and Propaganda
Rhetorical Appeals: Ethos, Pathos, Logos
Identifying and evaluating the three pillars of persuasion in historical and contemporary speeches.
2 methodologies
Visual Literacy and Advertising
Analyzing how layout, color, and symbolism are used in multi-modal texts to manipulate consumer behavior.
2 methodologies
Analyzing Logical Fallacies
Identifying common errors in reasoning (e.g., ad hominem, straw man, false dilemma) used in persuasive texts.
2 methodologies
Propaganda Techniques in Historical Context
Examining how propaganda was used during significant historical events to shape public opinion and mobilize populations.
2 methodologies
The Language of News Reporting
Investigating how word choice, framing, and omission can influence the perceived objectivity and bias of news articles.
2 methodologies
Ready to teach The Power of the Editorial?
Generate a full mission with everything you need
Generate a Mission