Civics & Citizenship · Year 7

Active learning ideas

Influence of Lobby Groups and Special Interests

Active learning lets students experience the real dynamics of policy influence firsthand. By role-playing lobbyists, dissecting real campaigns, and mapping power networks, they move beyond abstract definitions to see how arguments, evidence, and relationships shape laws.

• ACARA Content Descriptions
• AC9C7K02
• AC9C7K03

• 30–45 min
• Pairs → Whole Class
• 4 activities

Activity 01

• Case Study Analysis
• 45 min · Small Groups

Role-Play: Lobbying a Bill Committee

Divide class into lobby groups, parliamentarians, and citizens. Lobby teams prepare 3-minute pitches with evidence for or against a sample bill on plastic bans. Parliamentarians question and vote; debrief on methods and ethics. Rotate roles for second round.

Analyze the methods employed by lobby groups to influence legislation.

Facilitation Tip

During the role-play, assign a chairperson to model neutral committee questioning and keep debates focused on the bill’s wording, not personalities.

What to look for

Pose the question: 'Should all groups have equal access to politicians, or is it acceptable for some groups to have more influence due to their resources?' Facilitate a class debate, encouraging students to use vocabulary terms and refer to specific examples discussed.

• Analyze
• Evaluate
• Create
• Decision-Making
• Self-Management

Activity 02

• Case Study Analysis
• 35 min · Small Groups

Case Study Dissection: Real Campaigns

Provide sources on Australian cases like tobacco lobby or renewable energy advocates. Groups identify three influence tactics, rate legitimacy on a scale, and present findings. Class votes on most effective method and discusses ethics.

Critique the ethical implications of special interest groups having privileged access to politicians.

Facilitation Tip

In the case study dissection, provide each pair with a different source type (e.g., Hansard transcript, social media post, funding report) so students compare how evidence is framed differently.

What to look for

Provide students with short case studies of different lobby group actions, such as a submission to a parliamentary inquiry or a public advertisement. Ask them to identify the method used and classify it as either legitimate advocacy or potential undue influence, justifying their choice.

• Analyze
• Evaluate
• Create
• Decision-Making
• Self-Management

Activity 03

• Case Study Analysis
• 40 min · Pairs

Debate Pairs: Advocacy vs Influence

Pairs research one pro and one con example of special interests. They argue in a structured debate: opening statements, rebuttals, audience questions. Conclude with class synthesis on boundaries of fair lobbying.

Differentiate between legitimate advocacy and undue influence in the legislative process.

Facilitation Tip

For the debate pairs, give students a timer and a list of transition phrases to practice structured argumentation and rebuttal.

What to look for

Ask students to write down one specific method a lobby group might use to influence a new law. Then, have them briefly explain one potential ethical concern related to that method.

• Analyze
• Evaluate
• Create
• Decision-Making
• Self-Management

Activity 04

• Case Study Analysis
• 30 min · Pairs

Network Mapping: Visualise Power

Individuals or pairs chart connections between a lobby group, politicians, media, and public for a current issue like housing policy. Add arrows for influence types and strengths. Share and refine maps in whole class gallery walk.

Analyze the methods employed by lobby groups to influence legislation.

Facilitation Tip

In the network mapping activity, supply a starter list of groups and ask students to place them on a spectrum from grassroots to corporate, forcing them to justify placements with examples.

What to look for

Pose the question: 'Should all groups have equal access to politicians, or is it acceptable for some groups to have more influence due to their resources?' Facilitate a class debate, encouraging students to use vocabulary terms and refer to specific examples discussed.

• Analyze
• Evaluate
• Create
• Decision-Making
• Self-Management

A few notes on teaching this unit

Start with concrete examples students recognize, like school funding campaigns or climate petitions. Avoid overloading them with jargon; instead, build vocabulary as they encounter real texts. Research shows that when students analyse actual submissions or transcripts, they grasp the difference between persuasion and manipulation more clearly than through lectures alone.

Students will distinguish between legitimate advocacy and undue influence, identify lobbying methods tied to the legislative pathway, and explain how diverse groups participate in policy-making. Success looks like clear connections between tactics, evidence, and outcomes in discussions and products.

---

Watch Out for These Misconceptions

• During Role-Play: Lobbying a Bill Committee, watch for comments like 'Lobbying is always sneaky or underhanded.'

  During the role-play, pause after each group’s pitch and ask the committee to categorise the request as either a 'policy change' or a 'resource allocation.' This helps students see that many lobby efforts are direct, public, and tied to clear outcomes.

• During Debate Pairs: Advocacy vs Influence, watch for statements like 'Big donors control politicians completely.'

  During the debate, require each pair to cite at least one counter-example from the Case Study Dissection activity, such as how a grassroots campaign like the marriage equality movement shifted public opinion despite limited funds.

• During Network Mapping: Visualise Power, watch for assumptions that only large corporations appear in the network.

  During the mapping activity, provide a list of small NGOs and union groups alongside corporate names, and ask students to justify why each appears in the centre or periphery of the map based on their campaign reach and resources.

---

Methods used in this brief

• Case Study Analysis