Activity 01
Structured Academic Controversy: Athens vs. Sparta
Students are divided into four groups; two prepare arguments defending Athenian democracy, two defend the Spartan system. After presenting, groups switch sides and argue the opposing position, then synthesize together into a joint statement about what each system got right.
Critique whether Athenian democracy truly embodied democratic principles for all its inhabitants.
Facilitation TipDuring the Structured Academic Controversy, assign roles such as ‘Athens Advocate’ and ‘Sparta Critic’ to ensure balanced debate and prevent one-sided arguments.
What to look forFacilitate a Socratic seminar using the key questions. Begin by asking: 'Based on our readings, who was excluded from Athenian democracy and why?' Then, prompt students to debate: 'Was the Spartan system, despite its lack of citizen participation, more effective at providing security for its people than Athenian democracy?'