
Knowledge in the Social Sciences: Human Behaviour
An inquiry into the nature of knowledge in the social sciences, focusing on the methodological and epistemological issues in studying human behaviour.
TL;DR:The social sciences present unique epistemological challenges. Unlike the natural sciences, the 'objects' of study are human beings who have intentions, emotions, and the ability to change their behavior when being watched. This topic explores whether we can study humans with the same objectivity as atoms, or if we need a different approach (like 'Verstehen' or empathetic understanding).
About This Topic
The social sciences present unique epistemological challenges. Unlike the natural sciences, the 'objects' of study are human beings who have intentions, emotions, and the ability to change their behavior when being watched. This topic explores whether we can study humans with the same objectivity as atoms, or if we need a different approach (like 'Verstehen' or empathetic understanding).
In the Singapore context, where social stability and planning are key, understanding how we 'know' about society is vital. Students will look at issues like observer bias, the role of values in research, and the difficulty of conducting controlled experiments in social settings. This topic comes alive when students can physically model the patterns of human behavior through role plays and observational studies.
Key Questions
- Can human behavior be studied objectively?
- How do values influence social science research?
- What is the role of empathy in understanding society?
Watch Out for These Misconceptions
Common MisconceptionSocial science is 'easier' than natural science because it's just common sense.
What to Teach Instead
Social science is often 'harder' because variables are nearly impossible to control and humans are unpredictable. Using 'Station Rotations' to look at complex social data can help students see the rigor required.
Common MisconceptionSocial science can never be objective.
What to Teach Instead
While perfect objectivity is hard, social scientists use rigorous methods (like triangulation) to minimize bias. Peer-reviewing each other's 'research designs' helps students see how objectivity is pursued in practice.
Active Learning Ideas
See all activities→Role Play
The Hawthorne Effect
Students are divided into 'workers' and 'observers.' The observers change variables (like lighting or breaks) while the workers' productivity is measured. Students then discuss how the presence of the observer influenced the results.
Inquiry Circle
Designing a 'Value-Free' Survey
Groups try to write survey questions about a sensitive topic (e.g., social media use) without using 'loaded' language. They then swap surveys and critique them for hidden biases or values.
Think-Pair-Share
Natural vs. Social Science
Students list three differences between studying a chemical reaction and studying a protest. They share with a partner to determine if these differences are 'fundamental' or just 'practical.'
Frequently Asked Questions
Can human behavior be studied scientifically?
What is the 'insider-outsider' problem in social science?
How can active learning help students understand social science methodology?
How do values influence social science research?
More in Knowledge Construction in the Sciences
The Scientific Method and Falsification
Evaluate the principles of scientific methodology, focusing on induction, deduction, and Popper's theory of falsification.
8 methodologies
Scientific Revolutions and Paradigms
Explore Thomas Kuhn's concept of paradigm shifts and the historical evolution of scientific knowledge.
8 methodologies