Global Conflict, Local Impact: The Cold War · Semester 1

The Cambodian Genocide and Vietnamese Intervention

Studying the atrocities of the Cambodian genocide and the subsequent Vietnamese invasion and occupation.

About This Topic

This topic explores the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) and the attempt by Southeast Asian states to find a 'Third Way' during the Cold War. Students analyze the landmark 1955 Bandung Conference, where leaders like Sukarno and Nehru articulated the principles of anti-colonialism, sovereignty, and non-interference. The curriculum examines the challenges of maintaining neutrality when both superpowers were offering massive economic and military aid.

Students evaluate why some states, like Indonesia and Burma, were early champions of NAM, while others, like Thailand and the Philippines, chose to align with the US. Understanding NAM is essential for grasping the desire for 'strategic autonomy' that continues to influence Southeast Asian foreign policy today. This topic comes alive when students can engage in role-plays of the Bandung Conference and the diplomatic dilemmas of the era.

Active Learning Ideas

Simulation Game: The Bandung Conference

Students act as delegates from various Asian and African nations in 1955. They must draft a set of 'principles for coexistence' that address their shared colonial past and their desire to avoid the Cold War.

⏱ 50 min·Whole Class

Generate mission

Think-Pair-Share: The Price of Neutrality

Students discuss the prompt: 'Is it possible for a small nation to be truly non-aligned?' They weigh the benefits of independence against the loss of superpower aid and protection.

⏱ 25 min·Pairs

Generate mission

Inquiry Circle: NAM vs. Alliances

Groups compare the foreign policies of a NAM member (e.g., Indonesia) and a SEATO member (e.g., Thailand) during the 1960s, identifying the specific advantages and risks each country faced.

⏱ 45 min·Small Groups

Generate mission

Watch Out for These Misconceptions

Common Misconception

Non-alignment meant being 'neutral' or 'passive.'

What to Teach Instead

NAM was an active political movement that sought to change the global order and end colonialism. Peer discussion of Sukarno's 'New Emerging Forces' (NEFOS) helps students see the movement's activist nature.

Common Misconception

All NAM members were equally committed to the movement.

What to Teach Instead

Many members 'leaned' toward one superpower or the other while officially remaining non-aligned. A spectrum activity showing where different countries stood can help students see these practical nuances.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the 1955 Bandung Conference?

The Bandung Conference was a meeting of 29 Asian and African nations, many of them newly independent. It was a historic moment that promoted Afro-Asian economic and cultural cooperation and opposed colonialism by any nation.

What are the 'Ten Principles of Bandung'?

These principles included respect for fundamental human rights, respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all nations, and the settlement of all international disputes by peaceful means. They formed the core philosophy of the Non-Aligned Movement.

Why did the US view NAM with suspicion?

The US often viewed non-alignment as a 'pro-communist' stance, believing that 'if you are not with us, you are against us.' They feared that NAM would weaken the Western alliance and provide an opening for Soviet influence.

How can active learning help students understand the Non-Aligned Movement?

By simulating the Bandung Conference, students can experience the sense of support and solidarity felt by newly independent nations. This helps them understand the ideological appeal of NAM and the practical difficulties of navigating a world dominated by two superpowers.

Browse curriculum by country

• Americas
• US
• CA
• MX
• CL
• CO
• BR

• Europe
• UK
• IE
• FR
• DE
• ES
• IT
• NL
• PT
• SE

• Asia & Pacific
• IN
• SG
• AU