This topic explores the traditional definition of knowledge as 'justified true belief' (JTB). Students examine the criteria that must be met for something to count as knowledge rather than just a lucky guess or a strong opinion. This is a core component of Epistemology in the NCCA framework. It encourages students to be more critical of their own certainties and the information they encounter online.
NCCA Curriculum SpecificationsNCCA Philosophy LO 2.1: Distinguish between knowing, believing and opinion.NCCA Philosophy LO 2.2: Explore the concept of truth and how it is established.
Groups are given several scenarios (e.g., a horoscope coming true, a scientific discovery). They must apply the three criteria: Is it a belief? Is it true? Is it justified? They then present their verdict on whether it counts as 'knowledge'.
What is the difference between belief, opinion, and knowledge?
Present a 'Gettier Case' where someone has a justified true belief that is only true by luck. Students discuss in pairs why this feels different from 'real' knowledge and try to suggest a fourth criteria for the checklist.
Stations are set up for different sources of knowledge: Senses, Reason, Authority, and Intuition. Students move around, listing one thing they 'know' from that source and one reason that source might be unreliable.
If I believe it strongly enough, it becomes true for me.
Philosophy distinguishes between subjective belief and objective truth. Using 'Perspective-Taking' exercises helps students see that while beliefs are personal, knowledge requires external justification and truth.
Knowledge and facts are exactly the same thing.
A fact is a state of the world; knowledge is a person's relationship to that fact. Peer discussions about 'forgotten facts' help students see that knowledge requires an active mind to hold the belief.