This topic examines the boundaries of what can be known through the scientific method and pure reason. Students explore the 'demarcation problem', what separates science from non-science, and consider questions of value, purpose, and aesthetics that science may not be equipped to answer. This aligns with NCCA Philosophy LO 2.4 and supports the Junior Cycle 'Nature of Science' strand.
NCCA Curriculum SpecificationsNCCA Philosophy LO 2.5: Apply philosophical questioning to contemporary media and information.NCCA Philosophy LO 2.6: Evaluate the impact of technology on human knowledge and understanding.
Groups are given 'problems' like 'How do I cure cancer?' and 'Is this painting beautiful?'. They must decide which 'tools' (Scientific Method, Logic, Intuition, Tradition) are appropriate for each and explain why some tools fail in certain areas.
How does the internet change how we acquire knowledge?
One side argues that love is purely chemical and biological (reductionism), while the other argues that the 'experience' of love cannot be captured by data. Students must use specific examples to support their claims.
What makes a digital source of information reliable?
Students try to think of one thing they believe is true but cannot be proven by a laboratory experiment. They share with a partner to see if their partner can find a way to 'test' it scientifically.
Can artificial intelligence possess true knowledge?
Many things (like mathematical truths or moral values) aren't 'proven' by science but are still considered true. Using 'Category Sorting' helps students see that different types of truth require different types of proof.
Philosophy and Science are enemies.
Science actually began as 'Natural Philosophy'. Peer-teaching the history of thinkers like Newton helps students see that philosophy provides the logical framework that science uses to operate.