Skip to content
Sociology · Year 13

Active learning ideas

Sociology and Science

Can sociology be a science? This classic debate pits Positivists, who believe society can be studied objectively using quantitative methods, against Interpretivists, who argue that human meaning is too complex for the scientific method. Students will also explore the views of Kuhn (paradigms) and Popper (falsification).

National Curriculum Attainment TargetsAQA A-level Sociology 4.3.2.7AQA A-level Sociology 4.3.2.8
25–40 minPairs → Whole Class3 activities

Activity 01

Formal Debate40 min · Whole Class

Formal Debate: The Science Lab

One side argues that sociology is a science (Positivism), the other that it is an art (Interpretivism). They must use examples like Durkheim's study of suicide to prove their point.

Can society be studied using the methods of the natural sciences?
AnalyzeEvaluateCreateSelf-ManagementDecision-Making
Generate Complete Lesson

Activity 02

Inquiry Circle25 min · Small Groups

Inquiry Circle: The Black Swan

Groups are given a 'theory' (e.g., 'all students are lazy'). They must find a way to 'falsify' it (Popper), explaining why this is more scientific than trying to prove it true.

What are the interpretivist critiques of positivism?
AnalyzeEvaluateCreateSelf-ManagementSelf-Awareness
Generate Complete Lesson

Activity 03

Gallery Walk30 min · Pairs

Gallery Walk: Paradigms in History

Display major shifts in scientific thought (e.g., Flat Earth to Round Earth). Students discuss whether sociology has ever had a single 'paradigm' that everyone agrees on.

How do paradigms shape scientific and sociological knowledge?
UnderstandApplyAnalyzeCreateRelationship SkillsSocial Awareness
Generate Complete Lesson

A few notes on teaching this unit


Watch Out for These Misconceptions

  • Science is 100% objective and always right.

    Kuhn argued that science is shaped by 'paradigms' and social pressure. A 'paradigm shift' role play helps students see that science is also a social product.

  • Interpretivists don't use any evidence.

    They use qualitative evidence to gain 'Verstehen' (deep understanding). Peer discussion of 'thick description' helps students see that qualitative data is still rigorous and evidence-based.


Methods used in this brief