Skip to content
Dealing with Offending Behaviour
Psychology · Year 13 · Forensic Psychology · 4.º Período

Dealing with Offending Behaviour

An evaluation of the aims of custodial sentencing and its psychological effects on inmates. Students will also explore behaviour modification, anger management, and restorative justice programmes as alternatives or supplements to prison.

TL;DR:The final topic in Forensic Psychology evaluates how society deals with offending behaviour. Students examine the four aims of custodial sentencing: deterrence, incapacitation, retribution, and rehabilitation. They also look at the psychological effects of prison, such as 'institutionalisation' and 'prisonisation,' and evaluate alternatives like anger management, token economies, and restorative justice.

National Curriculum Attainment TargetsAQA A-level Psychology 7182 - 4.3.8.4AQA A-level Psychology 7182 - 4.3.8

About This Topic

The final topic in Forensic Psychology evaluates how society deals with offending behaviour. Students examine the four aims of custodial sentencing: deterrence, incapacitation, retribution, and rehabilitation. They also look at the psychological effects of prison, such as 'institutionalisation' and 'prisonisation,' and evaluate alternatives like anger management, token economies, and restorative justice.

This topic is highly relevant to current debates in the UK about prison reform and recidivism rates. It requires students to think critically about what 'justice' actually means and which methods are most effective at reducing reoffending. Students grasp this concept faster through structured discussion and peer explanation, where they can weigh the human cost of prison against the societal need for safety and punishment.

Key Questions

  1. Does custodial sentencing effectively deter future crime and rehabilitate offenders?
  2. How do token economies work within the prison system?
  3. What are the psychological benefits of restorative justice for victims?

Watch Out for These Misconceptions

Common MisconceptionPrison is the most effective way to deter all types of crime.

What to Teach Instead

Recidivism rates in the UK are high, suggesting prison often fails as a deterrent. Peer-led investigations into the 'psychological effects of prison' help students see how institutionalisation can actually make it harder for offenders to reintegrate into society.

Common MisconceptionRestorative justice is a 'soft option' for criminals.

What to Teach Instead

Research shows that facing the victim and hearing the impact of their crime is often more psychologically challenging for offenders than a prison sentence. Role-playing these sessions helps students understand the emotional intensity and accountability involved in restorative justice.

Active Learning Ideas

See all activities

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the four main aims of custodial sentencing?
The four aims are: 1) Deterrence (preventing future crime through fear of punishment), 2) Incapacitation (removing the offender from society to protect the public), 3) Retribution (providing a sense of 'justice' or revenge for the victim), and 4) Rehabilitation (reforming the offender through education or therapy so they can return to society).
What is 'institutionalisation' in the context of prison?
Institutionalisation occurs when an inmate becomes so accustomed to the norms and routines of prison life that they can no longer function independently in the outside world. They may lose the ability to make their own decisions or manage their own time, which significantly increases the likelihood of reoffending upon release.
How does restorative justice differ from traditional punishment?
Traditional punishment focuses on the offender breaking the law and receiving a penalty from the state. Restorative justice focuses on the harm caused to the victim and the community. It involves a supervised meeting where the offender takes responsibility for their actions and the victim has a chance to explain the impact, aiming for healing rather than just punishment.
How can active learning help students evaluate ways of dealing with offending?
Active learning, such as the 'Prison Reform Panel' debate, forces students to look at the system from multiple perspectives. By defending a specific viewpoint, they have to engage deeply with the evidence for and against different sentencing aims. This multi-perspective thinking is exactly what is required for the high-level 'evaluate' questions in the AQA forensic psychology paper.
Edited by Adriana Perusin, Editor-in-Chief, Flip Education