Forgetting is not just a failure of memory; it is a complex psychological process. This topic explores two main explanations: interference and retrieval failure. Students look at how similar memories can get 'tangled' (interference) and how the absence of the right cues can prevent us from accessing stored information (retrieval failure). This is a highly practical topic that students can relate to their own revision and learning experiences.
National Curriculum Attainment TargetsAQA 4.1.2.3 Explanations for forgetting: interferenceAQA 4.1.2.4 Explanations for forgetting: retrieval failure
Students are given the data from Godden and Baddeley's underwater memory study. They must graph the results and explain how the 'matching' versus 'non-matching' environments affected recall.
How does interference cause forgetting in long-term memory?
Students identify examples of proactive and retroactive interference from their own lives, such as calling a new partner by an ex's name or struggling to remember an old phone number. They swap and categorise each other's examples.
Give students a list of words to learn. Half the class gets a list with category headings (cues), and the other half gets a random list. Compare the recall rates to demonstrate the power of retrieval cues.
How do context and state-dependent cues aid memory retrieval?
Explain that in retrieval failure, the memory is still there but we lack the 'key' (cue) to access it. Using the 'library' analogy, where a book is in the building but misfiled, helps students understand that the trace exists even if it's currently unreachable.
Proactive and retroactive interference are the same.
Clarify that proactive is 'old interfering with new' and retroactive is 'new interfering with old'. Creating mnemonic devices or physical movements to represent the direction of the interference helps students keep them straight.