
Prosocial Behaviour and Bystander Intervention
Students explore the bystander effect and factors influencing prosocial behaviour. They will review Piliavin's subway study and the impact of deindividuation.
TL;DR:Prosocial behaviour refers to actions intended to help others, while the bystander effect explains why we often fail to act in emergencies. Students study Piliavin’s subway study, which challenged the idea of 'diffusion of responsibility' by showing that people are more likely to help when they can't easily escape the situation. They also investigate deindividuation, the loss of individual identity in a crowd, and how it can lead to anti-social or collective behaviour.
About This Topic
Prosocial behaviour refers to actions intended to help others, while the bystander effect explains why we often fail to act in emergencies. Students study Piliavin’s subway study, which challenged the idea of 'diffusion of responsibility' by showing that people are more likely to help when they can't easily escape the situation. They also investigate deindividuation, the loss of individual identity in a crowd, and how it can lead to anti-social or collective behaviour.
This topic is highly engaging for Year 11s as it touches on social justice and personal ethics. It connects to the broader curriculum by examining how situational factors (like crowd size) and personal factors (like expertise) interact. Active learning through simulations and case study analysis allows students to explore the 'cost-reward' model of helping, making the abstract concepts of social psychology feel immediate and relevant.
Key Questions
- What is the bystander effect?
- How does the presence of others influence helping behaviour?
- What causes deindividuation in crowds?
Watch Out for These Misconceptions
Common MisconceptionPeople don't help because they are selfish or uncaring.
What to Teach Instead
The bystander effect is often caused by 'pluralistic ignorance' (looking to others to see if it's an emergency) or 'diffusion of responsibility'. Using simulations helps students see that even 'good' people can be frozen by situational cues.
Common MisconceptionDeindividuation always leads to violence.
What to Teach Instead
Deindividuation can also lead to positive collective behaviour, like a crowd singing together at a concert. A gallery walk showing different crowd behaviours can help students see the nuance in this concept.
Active Learning Ideas
See all activities→Simulation Game
The Bystander Dilemma
A 'staged' minor incident occurs in the classroom (e.g., a student drops a large pile of papers). The teacher varies the conditions, sometimes the class is busy, sometimes only one student is present, to observe and then discuss the factors that led to helping.
Inquiry Circle
Piliavin vs Latane & Darley
Groups compare Piliavin’s subway study with the earlier 'smoke-filled room' study. They must create a chart showing why the results differed, focusing on factors like 'diffusion of responsibility' and the 'cost of helping'.
Role Play
Deindividuation in the Digital Age
Students act out a scenario involving an anonymous online forum. They discuss how being 'hidden' by a screen (deindividuation) changes how people speak to each other compared to a face-to-face conversation.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the 'diffusion of responsibility'?
What did Piliavin’s subway study find?
How does deindividuation affect behaviour?
How can active learning help students understand prosocial behaviour?
More in Social Influence
Conformity and Dispositional Factors
Students analyse why people conform to group pressures, examining Asch's research and the role of dispositional factors. They will differentiate between normative and informational social influence.
8 methodologies
Obedience and Authority
An investigation into obedience, focusing on Milgram's agency theory and Adorno's authoritarian personality. Students will discuss the ethical implications of obedience research.
8 methodologies