Skip to content
Global Governance: Political and Economic
Politics · Year 13 · Global Politics · 4.º Período

Global Governance: Political and Economic

An examination of international organisations such as the UN, IMF, World Bank, and WTO. Students will assess their effectiveness in managing global political and economic issues.

TL;DR:Global Governance explores the institutions and rules that attempt to manage an anarchic international system. Students examine the political role of the United Nations, focusing on the Security Council's effectiveness in maintaining peace. They also dive into economic governance through the 'Bretton Woods' institutions: the IMF, World Bank, and WTO, evaluating their impact on global stability and development.

National Curriculum Attainment TargetsDfE A-Level Politics Subject Content: Global GovernanceAQA 3.3.2.2 Global governance

About This Topic

Global Governance explores the institutions and rules that attempt to manage an anarchic international system. Students examine the political role of the United Nations, focusing on the Security Council's effectiveness in maintaining peace. They also dive into economic governance through the 'Bretton Woods' institutions: the IMF, World Bank, and WTO, evaluating their impact on global stability and development.

For Year 13 students, this unit is about the struggle for order. They analyse the tension between the 'liberal' goal of international cooperation and the 'realist' reality of great power politics. This topic particularly benefits from hands-on, student-centered approaches like a 'Model UN' or a 'Global Economic Summit' where students must negotiate from the perspective of different nations with conflicting interests.

Key Questions

  1. How effective is the UN Security Council in maintaining global peace?
  2. What role do the IMF and World Bank play in the global economy?
  3. Do global economic institutions disproportionately benefit the Global North?

Watch Out for These Misconceptions

Common MisconceptionThe UN is a 'world government' that can force countries to obey.

What to Teach Instead

The UN has no standing army and relies on the consent of its member states. A 'power-mapping' activity helps students see that the UN is a forum for cooperation, not a supreme authority over sovereign nations.

Common MisconceptionThe IMF and World Bank do the same thing.

What to Teach Instead

The IMF focuses on short-term financial stability and currency crises, while the World Bank focuses on long-term development and poverty reduction. Using a 'bank vs insurance' analogy helps students distinguish between their primary functions.

Active Learning Ideas

See all activities

Frequently Asked Questions

Who are the 'P5' and why do they matter?
The P5 are the five permanent members of the UN Security Council: the US, UK, France, Russia, and China. They matter because each holds a 'veto' power, meaning they can block any substantive resolution. This reflects the reality of power in 1945 but is often criticised for causing gridlock in modern crises.
What is the 'Washington Consensus'?
This refers to a set of free-market economic policies (like privatisation and deregulation) promoted by the IMF and World Bank. While intended to encourage growth, critics argue it often harms the poor in developing nations and imposes a 'one-size-fits-all' Western model on the rest of the world.
How can active learning help students understand Global Governance?
Role-playing international negotiations is essential. When students have to represent a country like Brazil or India and argue for a seat on the Security Council, or represent a debt-ridden nation negotiating with the IMF, they understand the power imbalances and the 'realpolitik' that definitions alone cannot convey. This active engagement makes the complex machinery of global institutions much more accessible.
How effective is the WTO?
The World Trade Organisation has been successful in reducing global tariffs and settling trade disputes. However, it has struggled to complete major new trade rounds (like the Doha Round) due to deep disagreements between developed and developing nations over agricultural subsidies and intellectual property.
Edited by Adriana Perusin, Editor-in-Chief, Flip Education