
Remedies in Tort
A review of the remedies available to a successful claimant in tort, focusing on compensatory damages and injunctions.
TL;DR:Remedies are the final stage of a tort claim, focusing on how the law 'makes good' the harm suffered by the claimant. This topic covers compensatory damages, which aim to put the claimant back in the position they would have been in had the tort not occurred (restitutio in integrum). Students learn to distinguish between special damages (calculable financial losses) and general damages (non-financial losses like pain and suffering).
About This Topic
Remedies are the final stage of a tort claim, focusing on how the law 'makes good' the harm suffered by the claimant. This topic covers compensatory damages, which aim to put the claimant back in the position they would have been in had the tort not occurred (restitutio in integrum). Students learn to distinguish between special damages (calculable financial losses) and general damages (non-financial losses like pain and suffering).
The unit also explores equitable remedies, primarily injunctions, which can be used to stop a continuing nuisance or prevent a future tort. Students evaluate the principles used by courts to decide when an injunction is more appropriate than damages. This topic is crucial for understanding the practical outcome of litigation and the limitations of the civil justice system.
This topic comes alive when students can physically model the patterns of damage calculation through collaborative problem-solving and 'settlement' negotiations.
Key Questions
- What is the aim of compensatory damages in tort?
- How are special and general damages calculated?
- Under what circumstances will a court grant an injunction?
Watch Out for These Misconceptions
Common MisconceptionDamages are meant to punish the defendant.
What to Teach Instead
In most tort cases, damages are purely compensatory, not punitive. A 'purpose of remedies' discussion helps students understand that the focus is on the claimant's loss, not the defendant's 'badness'.
Common MisconceptionYou can claim for any loss, no matter how much you ignored it.
What to Teach Instead
Claimants have a 'duty to mitigate' their loss, meaning they must take reasonable steps to keep the cost down (e.g., seeking medical help). A 'mitigation check' activity helps students identify where a claimant's award might be reduced.
Active Learning Ideas
See all activities→Inquiry Circle
The Damages Calculator
Provide groups with a 'claim file' for a personal injury case, including medical reports and receipts. Students must categorize each loss as 'special' or 'general' and use a simplified version of the Judicial College Guidelines to calculate a final award.
Role Play
Settlement Negotiation
In pairs, one student acts as the claimant's solicitor and the other as the insurance company's lawyer. They must negotiate a settlement for a negligence claim, justifying their figures based on the principles of mitigation and remoteness.
Think-Pair-Share
Injunction or Damages?
Present a scenario of a noisy factory next to a new housing estate. Students discuss in pairs whether the court should grant an injunction (closing the factory) or award damages to the residents, considering the impact on jobs and property rights.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between special and general damages?
How are damages for 'pain and suffering' decided?
What is a mandatory injunction?
How can active learning help students understand remedies?
More in Tort Law - Negligence and Liability
The Rules of Negligence
Students learn to establish liability in negligence by proving a duty of care, breach of duty, and resulting damage. They will apply the Caparo test and principles of causation.
8 methodologies
Occupiers' Liability
An examination of the liability of occupiers for injuries sustained on their premises. Students will compare the Occupiers' Liability Acts of 1957 and 1984.
8 methodologies