Skip to content
The Great Fire of London · Autumn Term

Samuel Pepys: A Witness's Diary

Using primary sources from Samuel Pepys' diary to understand the personal experience of living through the fire.

Key Questions

  1. Analyze how Samuel Pepys' diary provides a unique perspective on the Great Fire.
  2. Evaluate the reliability of a diary as a historical source.
  3. Explain what Pepys' actions, like burying his cheese, reveal about people's priorities during the disaster.

National Curriculum Attainment Targets

KS1: History - Events beyond living memoryKS1: History - Historical interpretations
Year: Year 2
Subject: History
Unit: The Great Fire of London
Period: Autumn Term

About This Topic

This topic examines the desperate and often dangerous methods used to combat the Great Fire. Without a modern fire brigade, Londoners had to rely on leather buckets, hand-pumped 'engines,' and the drastic measure of blowing up houses to create firebreaks. This highlights the concept of 'cause and consequence' in the National Curriculum.

Students explore how the lack of technology forced people to be creative and collaborative. They also learn about the role of the King and his brother in leading the firefighting efforts. Students grasp this concept faster through structured simulation where they have to 'solve' the problem of a spreading fire using limited tools.

Active Learning Ideas

Watch Out for These Misconceptions

Common MisconceptionThey had fire engines like we do today.

What to Teach Instead

Their 'engines' were tiny hand-pumps that often broke. Comparing a toy modern fire engine to a picture of a 1666 pump helps students see the massive difference in technology.

Common MisconceptionThe fire just went out by itself.

What to Teach Instead

It was stopped by the wind dying down and people creating firebreaks. A simulation showing a 'gap' in houses helps students understand how the fire finally ran out of 'fuel'.

Ready to teach this topic?

Generate a complete, classroom-ready active learning mission in seconds.

Frequently Asked Questions

How did they put out the Great Fire of London?
They didn't have enough water, so they used 'fire hooks' to pull down houses and even gunpowder to blow them up. This created a gap (a firebreak) so the flames couldn't reach the next building.
Who was in charge of fighting the fire?
King Charles II and his brother, the Duke of York, took charge. They helped pass buckets of water and made the difficult decision to destroy houses to save the rest of the city.
What are the best hands-on strategies for teaching 17th-century firefighting?
The 'Bucket Brigade' simulation is a classic for a reason. It physically demonstrates the exhaustion and inefficiency of 1666 methods. Following this with a collaborative problem-solving task about where to create firebreaks helps students understand the high-stakes decisions made by the King and the people of London.
Why didn't they just use water from the Thames?
They tried, but the water wheels at London Bridge were destroyed by the fire early on. This meant they had to carry every drop of water in leather buckets, which was very slow.

Browse curriculum by country

AmericasUSCAMXCLCOBR
Asia & PacificINSGAU