Activity 01
Debate Carousel: Hard vs Soft Engineering
Divide class into four groups representing stakeholders: engineers, residents, environmentalists, and officials. Each group prepares arguments for or against hard/soft solutions using case study data. Groups rotate to debate at four stations, voting on best strategy at the end.
Assess the effectiveness of different prediction and warning systems for tropical storms.
Facilitation TipDuring the Debate Carousel, assign roles clearly and provide a one-page evidence sheet so students can focus on argumentation rather than research at the stations.
What to look forPresent students with two case studies: one of a tropical storm where warning systems were highly effective (e.g., Hurricane Patricia, 2015) and one where they were less effective (e.g., Hurricane Katrina, 2005). Ask: 'What specific factors contributed to the success or failure of the warning systems in each case? How could the less effective system have been improved?'