Skip to content
Economics · Year 13

Active learning ideas

Quantitative Easing and Unconventional Monetary Policy

Active learning works for this topic because the mechanics of quantitative easing are abstract and often counterintuitive. Students need to manipulate data, simulate decisions, and debate outcomes to grasp how central banks expand balance sheets without printing currency directly. Concrete experiences turn policy jargon into visible cause-and-effect relationships.

National Curriculum Attainment TargetsA-Level: Economics - Macroeconomic PolicyA-Level: Economics - Monetary Policy
35–50 minPairs → Whole Class4 activities

Activity 01

Case Study Analysis50 min · Small Groups

Role-Play Simulation: Bank of England QE Decision

Assign roles as MPC members, Treasury officials, and economists. Present a crisis scenario with data on low growth and zero rates. Groups propose QE scale, justify with evidence, then vote and debrief on transmission mechanisms.

Explain the rationale behind quantitative easing when conventional monetary policy is ineffective.

Facilitation TipDuring the Role-Play Simulation, assign roles with clear mandates: Monetary Policy Committee members must justify asset choices using balance sheet targets, while commercial bankers explain how reserves affect lending decisions.

What to look forPose the question: 'Given that conventional interest rate cuts are no longer effective at the Zero Lower Bound, what are the primary arguments for and against the Bank of England implementing another round of Quantitative Easing?' Students should prepare to discuss at least two benefits and two risks.

AnalyzeEvaluateCreateDecision-MakingSelf-Management
Generate Complete Lesson

Activity 02

Case Study Analysis35 min · Pairs

Data Analysis: QE Impact Graphs

Provide Bank of England datasets on QE rounds, GDP, inflation, and asset prices. Pairs plot correlations, calculate percentage changes, and hypothesize causation vs correlation in a shared spreadsheet.

Analyze the potential risks and benefits of large-scale asset purchases by a central bank.

Facilitation TipFor the Data Analysis activity, provide Excel or Desmos files where students overlay QE rounds on inflation and GDP growth to observe lagged effects.

What to look forPresent students with a scenario: 'The UK economy is experiencing a severe recession, and the Bank of England's base rate is already at 0.1%. Briefly explain how the central bank could use asset purchases to try and stimulate lending and investment. Identify one potential unintended consequence of this policy.'

AnalyzeEvaluateCreateDecision-MakingSelf-Management
Generate Complete Lesson

Activity 03

Case Study Analysis45 min · Pairs

Debate Pairs: QE Benefits vs Risks

Divide class into pro-QE and anti-QE teams. Each prepares three arguments with evidence from UK cases. Debate in pairs, switch sides midway, then whole class votes on most persuasive points.

Evaluate the effectiveness of unconventional monetary policies in stimulating economic recovery.

Facilitation TipIn the Debate Pairs exercise, require each side to cite at least one Bank of England working paper or MPC minute to anchor arguments in real policy language.

What to look forAsk students to write on an index card: 'Define Quantitative Easing in your own words. Name one specific objective the Bank of England aims to achieve through QE and one potential risk associated with it.'

AnalyzeEvaluateCreateDecision-MakingSelf-Management
Generate Complete Lesson

Activity 04

Case Study Analysis40 min · Small Groups

Model Economy: QE Board Game

Create boards showing economy sectors. Students draw cards for shocks, apply QE by adding money tokens, track effects on output and inflation over rounds, adjusting rules based on group observations.

Explain the rationale behind quantitative easing when conventional monetary policy is ineffective.

What to look forPose the question: 'Given that conventional interest rate cuts are no longer effective at the Zero Lower Bound, what are the primary arguments for and against the Bank of England implementing another round of Quantitative Easing?' Students should prepare to discuss at least two benefits and two risks.

AnalyzeEvaluateCreateDecision-MakingSelf-Management
Generate Complete Lesson

A few notes on teaching this unit

Teachers should begin with a mini-lecture that maps the central bank’s balance sheet, showing assets and liabilities side-by-side before any activity. Avoid starting with inflation causes; instead, anchor QE in the Zero Lower Bound context where conventional tools fail. Research suggests students grasp unconventional policy best when they see how balance sheet expansion differs from interest rate changes, so emphasize the transmission channel from reserves to lending spreads.

Successful learning looks like students explaining how asset purchases create bank reserves, contrasting QE with helicopter money, and justifying policy choices with evidence rather than assumption. They should trace the transmission mechanism from bond purchases to lending and inflation, noting where risks enter the chain.


Watch Out for These Misconceptions

  • During the Data Analysis: QE Impact Graphs, watch for students equating bond purchases with immediate cash creation leading to hyperinflation.

    In the graphing activity, have students overlay base money growth with CPI changes and highlight the lag; point to the 2009-2013 period where base money rose sharply with low inflation.

  • During the Role-Play Simulation: Bank of England QE Decision, watch for assertions that QE directly funds government deficits.

    Use the simulation’s secondary market script: students must explain that the central bank buys bonds from pension funds or insurers, not from HM Treasury, and trace payments to private sellers.

  • During the Debate Pairs: QE Benefits vs Risks, watch for claims that QE carries no long-term risks.

    Require each pair to present one empirical risk (e.g., financial stability, wealth inequality) tied to a specific QE round documented in MPC minutes, then challenge the other side to propose a mitigating policy.


Methods used in this brief