Skip to content
Criminology · Year 13

Active learning ideas

The Role of Juries and Lay People

This topic evaluates the role of 'lay people', ordinary citizens without legal training, in the justice system. It focuses on Juries in the Crown Court and Lay Magistrates in the Magistrates' Court. For Year 13 students, this is a study in the democratic ideal of 'trial by peers' versus the need for legal expertise. This aligns with WJEC AC 2.5.

National Curriculum Attainment TargetsWJEC Level 3 AC 2.4 Assess key influences on the outcomes of criminal casesWJEC Level 3 AC 2.5 Discuss the use of lay people in criminal cases
25–45 minPairs → Whole Class3 activities

Activity 01

Formal Debate45 min · Whole Class

Formal Debate: Trial by Jury vs. Trial by Judge

Divide the class to debate whether juries should be replaced by professional judges in complex fraud or sensitive sexual assault cases. Students must use arguments regarding 'jury equity' versus 'legal literacy.'

How are juries selected in England and Wales?
AnalyzeEvaluateCreateSelf-ManagementDecision-Making
Generate Complete Lesson

Activity 02

Simulation Game30 min · Small Groups

Simulation Game: The Jury Selection Process

Simulate the 'vire dire' or challenge process. Provide a list of potential jurors with different backgrounds and biases. Students must decide who should be disqualified based on the Juries Act 1974.

What are the benefits and drawbacks of using lay magistrates?
ApplyAnalyzeEvaluateCreateSocial AwarenessDecision-Making
Generate Complete Lesson

Activity 03

Think-Pair-Share25 min · Pairs

Think-Pair-Share: The 'Magistrates' Muddle'

Present the pros and cons of lay magistrates (e.g., cost-effectiveness vs. 'middle-class bias'). Pairs must rank the top three benefits and top three drawbacks before sharing with the class.

Does the jury system consistently ensure a fair trial?
UnderstandApplyAnalyzeSelf-AwarenessRelationship Skills
Generate Complete Lesson

A few notes on teaching this unit


Watch Out for These Misconceptions

  • Juries have to explain why they reached their verdict.

    In the UK, jury deliberations are strictly secret, and they do not give reasons for their verdict. This is called 'jury equity.' Debating the secrecy rule helps students understand why this is both a strength and a weakness.

  • Magistrates are paid professionals.

    Lay Magistrates are volunteers who only receive expenses. They are supported by a legally qualified Clerk. Using a simulation of a Magistrates' bench helps students see the interaction between the lay people and their legal advisor.


Methods used in this brief