Civil Rights and Social Movements · Term 3

The Campaign for the 1967 Referendum

Investigate the historical context and the grassroots campaign leading up to Australia's 1967 Referendum.

About This Topic

The Mabo Decision and Land Rights focuses on the historic 1992 High Court ruling that overturned the doctrine of 'Terra Nullius' (land belonging to no one). This topic examines Eddie Koiki Mabo's decade-long legal battle to have his people's traditional ownership of the Meriam Islands recognized. Students investigate the legal reasoning behind the decision and its profound impact on Australian law and society.

In the Year 12 Modern History curriculum, this is a crucial study of Indigenous sovereignty and the struggle for justice. It aligns with ACARA's focus on the role of the judiciary and the impact of landmark legal cases. The study also covers the subsequent Native Title Act 1993 and the ongoing debates over land use, mining, and reconciliation.

This topic comes alive when students can physically model the legal arguments and the concept of 'continuity of connection' through collaborative case studies.

Active Learning Ideas

Inquiry Circle: Overturning Terra Nullius

Groups are given excerpts from the High Court's Mabo judgment. They must identify the specific evidence Mabo provided to prove his people's continuous connection to the land (e.g., gardening practices, social structures) and explain why the court finally rejected 'Terra Nullius'.

⏱ 50 min·Small Groups

Generate mission

Formal Debate: The Native Title Act

Divide the class into stakeholders: Indigenous groups, mining companies, pastoralists, and the Federal Government. Debate the 1993 Native Title Act, focusing on how to balance the recognition of traditional rights with the interests of other land users.

⏱ 50 min·Whole Class

Generate mission

Gallery Walk: The Legacy of Eddie Mabo

Display photos, quotes, and news articles about Eddie Mabo's life and the public reaction to the decision. Students move in pairs to record how the decision was celebrated by some as a moment of justice and feared by others as a threat to property rights.

⏱ 40 min·Pairs

Generate mission

Watch Out for These Misconceptions

Common Misconception

The Mabo decision meant that people would lose their backyards.

What to Teach Instead

The decision specifically stated that Native Title could only exist where it had not been extinguished by 'valid government acts' like the granting of freehold title (private homes). Peer discussion of the 'extinguishment' concept helps students understand the limits of the ruling.

Common Misconception

Native Title is the same as owning land in the Western sense.

What to Teach Instead

Native Title recognizes a unique set of rights based on traditional laws and customs, which may include the right to hunt, fish, or hold ceremonies, rather than just 'ownership'. A collaborative investigation into different Native Title determinations helps students see the variety of rights recognized.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was 'Terra Nullius'?

Terra Nullius is a Latin term meaning 'land belonging to no one.' It was the legal fiction used by the British to justify the colonization of Australia without a treaty or compensation, based on the false claim that Indigenous people did not 'own' or 'use' the land in a way Europeans recognized.

Who was Eddie Mabo?

Eddie Koiki Mabo was a Meriam man from the Torres Strait who became the lead plaintiff in the High Court case. Although he died just months before the final ruling in 1992, his name has become synonymous with the recognition of Indigenous land rights in Australia.

What is the Native Title Act 1993?

The Native Title Act was the Keating Government's legislative response to the Mabo decision. It created a legal framework for Indigenous people to claim native title and established a process for negotiating land use between traditional owners and other interests like mining and farming.

How can active learning help students understand the Mabo decision?

Active learning strategies like 'mock high court hearings' allow students to engage with the complex legal and moral arguments of the case. By acting as judges or lawyers, students must grapple with the evidence of 'continuous connection' and the historical injustice of 'Terra Nullius.' This approach makes the legal concepts more accessible and highlights the human persistence behind the landmark ruling.

Browse curriculum by country

• Americas
• US
• CA
• MX
• CL
• CO
• BR

• Europe
• UK
• IE
• FR
• DE
• ES
• IT
• NL
• PT
• SE

• Asia & Pacific
• IN
• SG
• AU