Skip to content
Civics & Citizenship · Year 9

Active learning ideas

Australia's Diplomatic Relations

Australia’s diplomatic relations involve complex choices about security, trade, and values, which students grasp best by doing. Active learning lets them experience how bilateral and multilateral ties function in real contexts, moving beyond textbook descriptions to see diplomacy as a tool for national goals.

ACARA Content DescriptionsAC9C9K03
35–50 minPairs → Whole Class4 activities

Activity 01

Jigsaw45 min · Small Groups

Jigsaw: Bilateral vs Multilateral

Divide class into expert groups on specific examples, such as Australia-US ANZUS Treaty or UN climate talks. Experts prepare key facts and principles, then jigsaw into mixed groups to teach and compare. Groups create a shared Venn diagram.

Analyze the key principles guiding Australia's diplomatic engagement.

Facilitation TipIn Jigsaw Expert Groups, assign each group a different bilateral or multilateral case study to research, then require them to teach their findings to peers using a one-page handout.

What to look forAsk students to write down one example of a bilateral relationship Australia has and one example of a multilateral forum Australia participates in. Then, have them briefly explain one reason why Australia engages in each.

UnderstandAnalyzeEvaluateRelationship SkillsSelf-Management
Generate Complete Lesson

Activity 02

Role Play50 min · Small Groups

Role-Play Simulation: Diplomatic Negotiation

Assign roles as Australian diplomats, counterparts, and observers in a fictional trade dispute. Students negotiate bilateral terms, then shift to multilateral forum for resolution. Debrief with reflections on principles and compromises.

Differentiate between bilateral and multilateral diplomacy.

Facilitation TipDuring the Role-Play Simulation, assign roles with clear national interests and a time limit for negotiations to force strategic thinking and compromise.

What to look forPresent a hypothetical global event, such as a major natural disaster in a neighboring country or a significant trade dispute between two global powers. Ask students: 'How might this event affect Australia's diplomatic priorities and relationships? Which type of diplomacy, bilateral or multilateral, might be most effective in responding?'

ApplyAnalyzeEvaluateSocial AwarenessSelf-Awareness
Generate Complete Lesson

Activity 03

Role Play35 min · Pairs

News Mapping: Global Events Impact

Provide recent headlines on events like South China Sea tensions. In pairs, students map Australia's response on a world map, linking to bilateral or multilateral actions and predicting priority shifts. Share via gallery walk.

Predict the impact of global events on Australia's diplomatic priorities.

Facilitation TipFor News Mapping, have students physically pin global events to a world map and link them to Australia’s diplomatic priorities using colored yarn or digital pins.

What to look forProvide students with short descriptions of different diplomatic actions. Ask them to classify each action as primarily bilateral or multilateral and justify their choice with one sentence.

ApplyAnalyzeEvaluateSocial AwarenessSelf-Awareness
Generate Complete Lesson

Activity 04

Role Play40 min · Pairs

Principles Debate Carousel

Post key principles around the room. Pairs rotate, debating how each guides diplomacy with evidence from real cases. Vote on most influential principle at end.

Analyze the key principles guiding Australia's diplomatic engagement.

Facilitation TipIn the Principles Debate Carousel, rotate groups every five minutes so students hear multiple perspectives before forming their own arguments.

What to look forAsk students to write down one example of a bilateral relationship Australia has and one example of a multilateral forum Australia participates in. Then, have them briefly explain one reason why Australia engages in each.

ApplyAnalyzeEvaluateSocial AwarenessSelf-Awareness
Generate Complete Lesson

A few notes on teaching this unit

Teachers should frame diplomacy as a problem-solving process, not just facts to memorize. Research shows students retain concepts better when they experience tension points, such as conflicting national interests, in controlled simulations. Avoid overloading with jargon; instead, connect principles like the rules-based order to tangible outcomes students can debate. Encourage skepticism of simple narratives, such as Australia being a passive follower, by designing tasks that demand agency.

By the end of these activities, students will explain how Australia pursues its interests through different diplomatic channels, evaluate trade-offs between bilateral and multilateral approaches, and justify decisions using evidence from DFAT documents. They will articulate the role of principles like the rules-based order in shaping outcomes.


Watch Out for These Misconceptions

  • During Role-Play Simulation, some students may assume diplomacy is just polite conversation without strategy.

    Use the negotiation simulation to confront this by giving each role a hidden national interest and a red-line condition. Students must trade concessions to meet their goals, revealing how diplomacy balances cooperation and self-interest.

  • During Jigsaw Expert Groups, students may believe bilateral ties are always stronger than multilateral ones.

    Provide each group with a comparison chart of bilateral and multilateral case studies. Require them to present one strength and one limitation of their assigned format, using data from DFAT documents to ground their claims.

  • During Role-Play Simulation, students might think Australia only follows major powers without independent influence.

    Design roles so Australia leads in at least one negotiation track, such as proposing a Quad initiative. After the simulation, debrief by asking students to reflect on moments when Australia shaped the outcome, using Quad documents as evidence.


Methods used in this brief