Civics & Citizenship · Year 10

Active learning ideas

International Trade and Agreements

Active learning works because trade agreements shape Australia’s economy in uneven ways. Students need to move beyond abstract ideas to see real impacts on jobs, industries, and laws. Hands-on tasks let them test assumptions, debate trade-offs, and connect theory to lived experience.

• ACARA Content Descriptions
• AC9C10K03

• 35–60 min
• Pairs → Whole Class
• 4 activities

Activity 01

• Formal Debate
• 50 min · Small Groups

Debate Carousel: Trade Agreement Pros and Cons

Divide class into small groups to research one benefit or drawback of a trade agreement, such as AUSFTA. Groups rotate to four stations, adding arguments to posters. Conclude with whole-class debate on net impacts.

Explain the benefits and drawbacks of international trade agreements.

Facilitation Tip

For the Debate Carousel, assign each group a clear role—proponent or critic—and provide a one-page fact sheet with industry data to anchor their arguments.

What to look for

Pose the question: 'If Australia signs a new trade agreement that leads to job losses in one sector but significant growth in another, how should the government balance these competing interests?' Facilitate a class debate, asking students to cite specific industries and potential policy responses.

• Analyze
• Evaluate
• Create
• Self-Management
• Decision-Making

Activity 02

• Jigsaw
• 45 min · Small Groups

Jigsaw: Global Supply Chains

Assign expert groups to trace a product like Australian beef from farm to overseas market, noting ethical issues. Regroup to share findings and discuss policy solutions. Use maps and flowcharts for visuals.

Analyze the impact of trade policies on Australian industries.

Facilitation Tip

During the Jigsaw Activity, give each expert group a different supply chain map to annotate with environmental or labor concerns before teaching their findings to home groups.

What to look for

Provide students with a short case study of a hypothetical trade agreement. Ask them to identify one potential benefit for an Australian industry and one potential risk to Australian sovereignty, writing their answers on a whiteboard or digital tool.

• Understand
• Analyze
• Evaluate
• Relationship Skills
• Self-Management

Activity 03

• Formal Debate
• 60 min · Small Groups

Role-Play Simulation: Trade Negotiations

Students represent stakeholders like farmers, manufacturers, or government officials in mock talks on RCEP terms. Prepare positions, negotiate compromises, then vote on outcomes and reflect on sovereignty trade-offs.

Evaluate the ethical implications of global supply chains.

Facilitation Tip

In the Role-Play Simulation, provide each negotiator with a confidential brief that includes their country’s priorities and red lines to make the stakes feel real.

What to look for

Ask students to write down one specific Australian industry and explain how a current or past trade agreement has influenced its operations. Then, ask them to list one ethical concern related to a global supply chain for a common consumer product.

• Analyze
• Evaluate
• Create
• Self-Management
• Decision-Making

Activity 04

• Formal Debate
• 35 min · Pairs

Case Study Pairs: Industry Impacts

Pairs analyze a real case, such as car manufacturing under trade deals. Identify winners and losers, then present findings to class with evidence from news articles.

Explain the benefits and drawbacks of international trade agreements.

Facilitation Tip

For the Case Study Pairs, give students two contrasting industries (e.g., dairy vs. steel) and ask them to trace how the same agreement affects each one differently.

What to look for

Pose the question: 'If Australia signs a new trade agreement that leads to job losses in one sector but significant growth in another, how should the government balance these competing interests?' Facilitate a class debate, asking students to cite specific industries and potential policy responses.

• Analyze
• Evaluate
• Create
• Self-Management
• Decision-Making

A few notes on teaching this unit

Start with concrete examples rather than definitions. Use Australia’s CPTPP or AUSFTA to show how the same agreement can boost wheat exports while threatening local car parts makers. Encourage students to interrogate who benefits, who loses, and why. Avoid getting stuck on jargon like ‘sovereignty’—translate it into real policy choices students can debate. Research shows that role-play and jigsaw formats deepen understanding of complex systems better than lectures alone.

By the end of these activities, students will explain how trade agreements affect different sectors, evaluate competing claims, and identify ethical dilemmas in global supply chains. They will use evidence to support their views and recognize that benefits and drawbacks are not distributed equally.

---

Watch Out for These Misconceptions

• During Debate Carousel, watch for students claiming that trade agreements benefit all Australian industries equally.

  Provide each debate group with a table of export and import data by industry. During preparation, guide them to compare sectors like agriculture and manufacturing to see who gains or loses, then use this evidence in their arguments.

• During Role-Play Simulation, watch for students assuming trade agreements have no impact on national sovereignty.

  Give each negotiating team a card listing an investor-state dispute clause example. As the simulation unfolds, prompt teams to react to how this clause could limit Australia’s ability to change a law, then debrief with a class discussion on sovereignty.

• During Jigsaw Activity, watch for students assuming global supply chains are always ethical and sustainable.

  Provide each expert group with a product’s supply chain map that includes a red flag like child labor or deforestation. Ask students to label the ethical issue, research alternatives, and present their findings to challenge the assumption that all chains are fair.

---

Methods used in this brief

• Formal Debate
• Jigsaw