Activity 01
Formal Debate: Lin Zexu's Letter vs. British Parliamentary Arguments
Students receive Commissioner Lin Zexu's 1839 letter to Queen Victoria arguing against the opium trade on moral and legal grounds, alongside excerpts from the British parliamentary debate justifying going to war. Small groups analyze each document's argument, then debate: whose position do you find more consistent with the principles of international law and ethics? This requires students to separate their moral judgment from historical analysis.
Justify the British rationale for the opium trade versus China's opposition.
Facilitation TipDuring the Structured Debate, assign clear roles for prosecutors, defenders, and neutral judges to ensure all students engage with the arguments in Lin Zexu's letter and British parliamentary speeches.
What to look forPose the following question to small groups: 'Imagine you are a Qing Dynasty official in 1840. Write a brief statement justifying China's ban on opium and detailing your concerns about British actions.' Have groups share their statements and discuss the core arguments.