Activity 01
Structured Academic Controversy: Was Total War Justified
Divide the class into two groups. One argues that Sherman's tactics were militarily necessary and shortened the war, saving lives overall. The other argues that targeting civilians and their livelihoods was morally wrong regardless of military effectiveness. After structured presentations, groups switch sides, then the class builds a consensus statement.
Explain the concept of 'total war' and how it was implemented by Union generals like Grant and Sherman.
Facilitation TipDuring the Structured Academic Controversy, assign roles explicitly so students practice perspective-taking before debating the justification of total war tactics.
What to look forFacilitate a class debate on the following question: 'Was the implementation of total war tactics by Union generals a necessary evil for achieving victory, or did it cross an unacceptable ethical line?' Students should use specific examples from Sherman's March to support their arguments.