Civil Liberties & Civil Rights · Weeks 10-18

Gender Equality & The 19th Amendment

The history of the women's suffrage movement and the ongoing legal battles over Title IX and the ERA.

About This Topic

This topic traces the women's suffrage movement from the Seneca Falls Convention in 1848 through decades of activism, leading to the 19th Amendment's ratification in 1920. Students examine leaders like Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Alice Paul, along with tactics such as marches, arrests, and state-level campaigns. The content extends to modern struggles, including Title IX's 1972 enactment to end sex discrimination in federally funded education programs and the Equal Rights Amendment's failure to gain ratification despite congressional approval in 1972.

Within the civil liberties and civil rights unit, students connect these events to the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause and judicial scrutiny levels: strict scrutiny for suspect classifications versus intermediate scrutiny for gender. They address key questions on ERA ratification politics, Title IX's effects on academics and campus safety, and scrutiny implications in cases like United States v. Virginia. These align with C3 standards on civic processes and historical causation.

Active learning benefits this topic by immersing students in role-plays of suffrage debates or Title IX enforcement scenarios. Such approaches build analytical skills, encourage perspective-taking, and make legal doctrines relatable through peer collaboration and evidence-based arguments.

Learning Objectives

• Analyze the primary arguments and tactics employed by leaders of the women's suffrage movement to achieve the 19th Amendment.
• Evaluate the legal reasoning behind the Supreme Court's application of intermediate scrutiny to gender-based discrimination cases, citing United States v. Virginia.
• Compare and contrast the historical ratification processes and political obstacles faced by the 19th Amendment and the proposed Equal Rights Amendment.
• Explain how Title IX's provisions have impacted educational opportunities and institutional policies beyond athletic programs in US colleges and universities.
• Critique the effectiveness of legal standards like 'strict scrutiny' and 'intermediate scrutiny' in advancing gender equality in the United States.

Before You Start

The U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights

Why: Students need a foundational understanding of the Constitution's structure and the concept of amendments to grasp the significance of the 19th Amendment and the ERA.

The Civil Rights Movement and Legislation

Why: Familiarity with earlier civil rights struggles and landmark legislation provides context for understanding the legal framework and activism surrounding gender equality.

Foundations of American Democracy

Why: Understanding concepts like voting rights, representation, and the amendment process is essential for analyzing the suffrage movement and the ERA's ratification.

Key Vocabulary

Suffrage	The right to vote in political elections. The women's suffrage movement fought for this right for women in the United States.
19th Amendment	A constitutional amendment ratified in 1920 that prohibits the states and the federal government from denying the right to vote to citizens of the United States on the basis of sex.
Title IX	A federal law passed in 1972 that prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.
Equal Rights Amendment (ERA)	A proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution designed to guarantee equal legal rights for all American citizens regardless of sex. It failed to achieve ratification by the required number of states.
Intermediate Scrutiny	A legal test used by courts to determine if a law or policy that discriminates based on sex or gender is constitutional. The government must show the classification serves important governmental objectives and is substantially related to achieving those objectives.

Active Learning Ideas

Jigsaw: Suffrage Strategies

Divide class into expert groups on key tactics: petitions, parades, picketing, lobbying. Each group researches one method's successes and failures using primary sources. Experts then teach their peers in mixed home groups, creating a class timeline of strategies.

⏱ 45 min·Small Groups

Generate mission

Mock Hearing: Title IX Case

Assign roles as plaintiffs, defendants, lawyers, and judges for a simulated Title IX complaint, such as unequal facilities. Students prepare arguments citing the law and precedents, present evidence, and deliberate a ruling with written justifications.

⏱ 50 min·Small Groups

Generate mission

Formal Debate: ERA Ratification

Split class into pro-ERA and anti-ERA teams from the 1970s-1980s. Provide packets with state arguments, Phyllis Schlafly quotes, and ratification timelines. Teams debate for 20 minutes, followed by whole-class vote and reflection on political barriers.

⏱ 40 min·Whole Class

Generate mission

Scrutiny Analysis Gallery Walk

Post case summaries on strict vs. intermediate scrutiny (e.g., Loving v. Virginia vs. Craig v. Boren). Pairs rotate, annotating charts with compelling interest tests and narrow tailoring. Conclude with class synthesis on gender classification.

⏱ 35 min·Pairs

Generate mission

Real-World Connections

Attorneys specializing in civil rights law at organizations like the ACLU continue to litigate cases related to gender discrimination in education and employment, drawing directly on the legal precedents set by Title IX and interpretations of the Equal Protection Clause.

University administrators and compliance officers at institutions nationwide must regularly review and update policies on admissions, financial aid, and campus safety to ensure adherence to Title IX regulations, impacting student experiences and institutional funding.

Voters in upcoming elections may encounter ballot initiatives or candidate platforms addressing issues of gender equality, potentially referencing the historical struggles for suffrage and the ongoing debates surrounding amendments like the ERA.

Watch Out for These Misconceptions

Common Misconception

The 19th Amendment ended all gender discrimination in voting immediately.

What to Teach Instead

Southern states used poll taxes and literacy tests to suppress Black women's votes for decades. Active role-plays of voter registration drives help students confront these barriers and appreciate the Voting Rights Act's later role.

Common Misconception

Title IX applies only to sports.

What to Teach Instead

The law covers all education programs, including admissions, scholarships, and sexual harassment policies. Student-led audits of school policies reveal its broad reach and spark discussions on enforcement gaps.

Common Misconception

The ERA was ratified but ignored.

What to Teach Instead

It secured 35 states but needed 38; deadlines lapsed without extension. Timeline-building activities clarify the procedural failure and ongoing revival efforts.

Assessment Ideas

Discussion Prompt

Pose the question: 'Beyond athletics, what are two specific ways Title IX has reshaped college campuses, and what challenges remain in its implementation?' Encourage students to cite examples from their readings or research.

Exit Ticket

Ask students to write on an index card: 'Identify one key leader from the suffrage movement and one tactic they used.' Then, 'Explain in one sentence why the ERA has not yet been ratified.'

Quick Check

Present students with a hypothetical scenario involving a college program facing a Title IX investigation. Ask them to identify which legal standard ('strict scrutiny' or 'intermediate scrutiny') would likely be applied and briefly explain why.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did the Equal Rights Amendment fail ratification?

Congress approved the ERA in 1972 with a seven-year deadline, but only 35 states ratified it by 1982, short of the 38 needed. Opponents, led by Phyllis Schlafly, argued it would mandate unisex facilities, draft women, and undermine family laws. States like Illinois rescinded approvals, complicating counts. Recent lawsuits challenge the deadline, but certification remains elusive. Students benefit from analyzing these political dynamics through primary documents.

How has Title IX changed American education beyond athletics?

Title IX prohibits sex discrimination in all federally funded programs, leading to equal access in STEM courses, pregnant student protections, and policies against sexual violence. Schools now offer comparable scholarships and handle harassment complaints uniformly. Enforcement by the Office for Civil Rights has prompted compliance reviews. Data shows increased female enrollment in higher education and leadership roles, though gaps persist in certain fields.

What are the differences between strict scrutiny and intermediate scrutiny in gender cases?

Strict scrutiny, for race or fundamental rights, requires a compelling government interest and narrow tailoring; it rarely succeeds. Intermediate scrutiny for gender demands an important objective and substantial relation, as in intermediate cases like Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan. This framework shapes rulings on policies like single-sex schools, balancing equality with state interests.

How can active learning help teach gender equality and the 19th Amendment?

Role-plays of suffrage parades or Title IX hearings let students embody historical figures and legal roles, fostering empathy and critical thinking. Jigsaws on strategies distribute expertise, while debates on the ERA reveal ratification nuances. These methods make abstract rights tangible, improve retention through collaboration, and connect past struggles to current issues like equal pay.