Skip to content
Geography · 9th Grade

Active learning ideas

Global Urban Models

Active learning works especially well for global urban models because students often default to familiar North American patterns. By physically manipulating maps, discussing lived experiences, and layering historical context, students move past oversimplified assumptions and recognize why cities develop differently around the world.

Common Core State StandardsC3: D2.Geo.5.9-12C3: D2.Geo.2.9-12
25–40 minPairs → Whole Class3 activities

Activity 01

Jigsaw30 min · Small Groups

Compare-Contrast: Latin American vs. North American City Structures

Provide paired simplified maps: one US city (Chicago or Detroit) and one Latin American city (São Paulo or Mexico City). Groups annotate both with the corresponding model overlay and identify three major structural differences. Each group presents one key finding and explains the historical or geographic factor behind it.

Analyze how Latin American or Asian city models differ from North American ones.

Facilitation TipDuring the Compare-Contrast activity, have students physically place colored strips along a map to mark commercial spines and squatter rings so the spatial logic becomes visible before analysis begins.

What to look forProvide students with a map of a city from Latin America or Asia (e.g., São Paulo, Mumbai). Ask them to identify and label at least two features that align with the described global urban models and one feature that seems to deviate, explaining their reasoning.

UnderstandAnalyzeEvaluateRelationship SkillsSelf-Management
Generate Complete Lesson

Activity 02

Socratic Seminar25 min · Whole Class

Socratic Seminar: Does Urban Theory Have a Home Country?

Students read a brief excerpt comparing how Griffin-Ford and Burgess were each developed, then discuss: 'To what extent do urban models reflect the place and time of their creation?' Students must cite specific model features as evidence and respond to classmates' claims before the facilitator draws the discussion to synthesis.

Explain the unique geographic and historical factors that shape urban structures in the Global South.

Facilitation TipIn the Socratic Seminar, assign the ‘home country’ prompt as a silent 3-minute write before discussion so quiet students enter with prepared reasoning, not just reactions.

What to look forFacilitate a class discussion using the prompt: 'If a student from Lagos were to visit Chicago, what aspects of Chicago's urban layout might seem unfamiliar or confusing compared to their own city? Conversely, what aspects of Lagos might a Chicago student struggle to understand using only North American urban models?'

AnalyzeEvaluateCreateSocial AwarenessRelationship Skills
Generate Complete Lesson

Activity 03

Jigsaw40 min · Small Groups

Jigsaw: One City, Multiple Lenses

Assign each group a different global megacity (Lagos, Jakarta, Cairo, São Paulo, Mumbai). Groups identify what urban model best explains their city's structure and why. Students then regroup across cities, compare findings, and produce a class synthesis about which factors most strongly shape urban structure globally.

Predict how rapid urbanization in Africa might lead to new urban models.

Facilitation TipDuring the Jigsaw, give each expert group a single city’s poster and a set of colored sticky notes labeled with model features so they must decide which label fits where before presenting to peers.

What to look forOn an exit ticket, have students write one sentence explaining why a single urban model cannot accurately describe cities worldwide. Then, ask them to list one specific historical or geographic factor that contributes to urban diversity.

UnderstandAnalyzeEvaluateRelationship SkillsSelf-Management
Generate Complete Lesson

Templates

Templates that pair with these Geography activities

Drop them into your lesson, edit them, and print or share.

A few notes on teaching this unit

Teachers should foreground primary evidence over textbook diagrams. Use recent satellite imagery of São Paulo’s periphery alongside Ford’s 1980 diagrams to show how squatter settlements have expanded over decades, not vanished. Avoid framing Global South cities as ‘cases’ of the North’s past; instead, treat each city as a distinct archive of policy choices, migration waves, and resistance to displacement. Research in urban geography (e.g., Roy 2009) shows that students grasp model limitations faster when they see the models themselves embedded in historical photographs and oral histories.

Successful learning looks like students confidently tracing the colonial CBD spine in Bogotá’s model, debating why Mumbai’s informal settlements persist as permanent housing, and explaining how a single city can embody multiple models depending on whose perspective they adopt. They move from memorizing names to critiquing the limits of any one framework.


Watch Out for These Misconceptions

  • During the Compare-Contrast: Latin American vs. North American City Structures activity, watch for students claiming that the Burgess model applies universally because the concentric zones resemble rings they see on any city map.

    Use the side-by-side maps of Chicago and Lima to show that Chicago’s wealthy live in the outer rings while Lima’s wealthy cluster along the commercial spine near the historic center; ask students to trace income gradients with arrows to make the inversion explicit.

  • During the Socratic Seminar: Does Urban Theory Have a Home Country? activity, watch for students normalizing North American models as the ‘default’ version of urban development.

    Provide a prompt that forces perspective-taking: ‘A planner from Lagos says North American models erase colonial legacies. A planner from Chicago says their model is the only one with empirical data. How would you respond to each claim using evidence from the Griffin-Ford model or your own research?’

  • During the Jigsaw: One City, Multiple Lenses activity, watch for students treating informal settlements as temporary or peripheral anomalies rather than core urban structures.

    Ask each expert group to identify formal vs. informal land tenure systems on their city’s map and then debate whether ‘informal’ is a legal category or a lived reality. Have them mark both formal CBD and informal settlement on the same concentric circle to expose the misconception visually.


Methods used in this brief