Activity 01
Structured Academic Controversy: English as Unity or Erasure
Assign pairs to argue that global English dominance benefits communication and economic development, while other pairs argue it constitutes cultural erasure that marginalizes non-English speakers. After both sides present, pairs swap positions and argue the opposite view. Groups then work together to identify the strongest points from both sides and formulate a nuanced position that acknowledges both geographic benefits and costs.
Assess whether the dominance of English is a tool for global unity or a form of cultural erasure.
Facilitation TipDuring the Structured Academic Controversy, assign the same perspective to pairs of students to ensure they prepare thoroughly before regrouping for debate.
What to look forPose the question: 'Is the global dominance of English a net positive or negative for cultural diversity?' Assign students roles representing different perspectives (e.g., a diplomat, an indigenous elder, a tech entrepreneur) to debate the issue, citing specific geographic and historical evidence.