Civics & Government · 9th Grade

Active learning ideas

The Fourth Branch: Federal Agencies

Active learning works because rulemaking is a process of translating broad laws into concrete details, which requires students to engage with real-world materials and perspectives. When students examine agency documents, debate trade-offs, and simulate public comment, they see how expertise, politics, and public input shape regulations.

• Common Core State Standards
• C3: D2.Civ.6.9-12
• C3: D2.Civ.13.9-12

• 20–45 min
• Pairs → Whole Class
• 4 activities

Activity 01

• Gallery Walk
• 35 min · Small Groups

Gallery Walk: Agency Fact-File Stations

Post fact sheets on five to six agencies (EPA, FDA, FCC, USDA, FAA, FTC) at stations around the room. Each sheet includes the agency's parent legislation, a recent major rule, and one example of how that rule affects students directly. Groups rotate and annotate each station with the source of the agency's authority, who the rule benefits, and who bears the cost.

Analyze the government's role in regulating private industry for safety.

Facilitation Tip

During the Gallery Walk, position one expert student at each station to present the agency’s role and hand out primary documents for students to annotate in pairs.

What to look for

Provide students with a brief description of a new law passed by Congress (e.g., a law requiring all new buildings to be energy efficient). Ask them to identify one federal agency that might create regulations for this law and list two specific details the agency might include in its rules.

• Understand
• Apply
• Analyze
• Create
• Relationship Skills
• Social Awareness

Activity 02

• Think-Pair-Share
• 20 min · Pairs

Think-Pair-Share: Who Should Set the Rule?

Present a scenario: Congress has passed a law requiring "safe" levels of microplastics in drinking water but defined nothing further. Students write individually about who should set the specific number. Pairs then debate whether that decision should belong to scientists, elected officials, or a public vote, and identify the tradeoffs of each answer.

Evaluate how to balance expertise with democratic accountability in agencies.

Facilitation Tip

In the Think-Pair-Share, assign one student to argue from the perspective of an agency official, another from an industry representative, and a third as a neutral moderator.

What to look for

Pose the question: 'Should an agency be allowed to create rules that have the force of law, even if they weren't directly voted on by elected representatives?' Facilitate a debate where students argue for or against this idea, citing the need for expertise versus democratic control.

• Understand
• Apply
• Analyze
• Self-Awareness
• Relationship Skills

Activity 03

• Structured Academic Controversy
• 45 min · Small Groups

Structured Academic Controversy: Regulation vs. Innovation

Divide the class in half: one side argues the FDA's drug approval timeline protects public safety, the other argues it delays life-saving treatments. Each side presents, then groups switch positions, then negotiate a consensus statement. This models how real regulatory debates unfold between safety advocates and industry.

Design a just regulatory policy for emerging technologies.

Facilitation Tip

For the Structured Academic Controversy, provide students with a two-column chart to organize evidence for regulation versus innovation before they debate.

What to look for

Present students with a scenario where a proposed agency regulation is facing public criticism. Ask them to identify one argument supporting the regulation based on agency expertise and one argument opposing it based on potential negative impacts or lack of democratic input.

• Analyze
• Evaluate
• Create
• Social Awareness
• Relationship Skills

Activity 04

• Fishbowl Discussion
• 40 min · Whole Class

Fishbowl Discussion: Public Comment Simulation

Students role-play a real public comment process. Three to four students represent an agency proposing a new food labeling rule; classmates represent consumer groups, industry lobbyists, and public health advocates. After testimony, the "agency" deliberates and announces its final rule with justification.

Analyze the government's role in regulating private industry for safety.

What to look for

Provide students with a brief description of a new law passed by Congress (e.g., a law requiring all new buildings to be energy efficient). Ask them to identify one federal agency that might create regulations for this law and list two specific details the agency might include in its rules.

• Analyze
• Evaluate
• Social Awareness
• Self-Awareness

A few notes on teaching this unit

Teach this topic by starting with the gap between laws and their implementation, then move to the mechanics of rulemaking. Avoid presenting agencies as neutral or permanent; instead, highlight their political and evolving nature. Research shows that when students trace actual rules from proposal to revision, they grasp the fluidity of regulatory power better than through abstract lectures.

Successful learning looks like students recognizing that agencies do more than enforce laws, that rules evolve through public participation, and that agency decisions balance technical evidence with political values. They should be able to explain why rulemaking is both expert-driven and accountable to the public.

---

Watch Out for These Misconceptions

• During the Gallery Walk: Agency Fact-File Stations, some students may claim that 'agencies just enforce the law -- they don't make it.'

  During the Gallery Walk, have students compare the text of a statute like the Clean Air Act with the EPA’s proposed emission standards. Ask them to mark where Congress set broad goals and where the agency filled in the specific details, then discuss why those details have the force of law.

• During the Fishbowl: Public Comment Simulation, students may assume that 'agency rules are permanent and hard to change.'

  During the Fishbowl, require each speaker to cite at least one example of a rule that was challenged, revised, or rescinded. Have students record these examples on a timeline to show the rulemaking process is iterative, not static.

• During the Structured Academic Controversy: Regulation vs. Innovation, students might believe that 'agencies are politically neutral technical bodies.'

  During the Structured Academic Controversy, provide students with appointee bios and agency priorities from two different administrations. Ask them to identify how leadership changes alter rulemaking goals, then debate whether technical expertise can ever be separated from political values.

---

Methods used in this brief

• Gallery Walk
• Think-Pair-Share
• Structured Academic Controversy
• Fishbowl Discussion