Civics & Government · 9th Grade

Active learning ideas

Campaign Finance and PACs

This topic requires students to grapple with complex legal, ethical, and practical tensions in campaign finance. Active learning works because students must apply abstract rules to concrete scenarios, debate competing values, and trace real-world consequences. When students analyze data, role-play reform, and debate doctrine, they move beyond memorization to evaluate how legal structures shape political power.

• Common Core State Standards
• C3: D2.Civ.5.9-12
• C3: D2.Civ.11.9-12

• 40–55 min
• Pairs → Whole Class
• 4 activities

Activity 01

• Structured Academic Controversy
• 50 min · Pairs

Structured Academic Controversy: Is Money a Form of Protected Speech?

Pairs research the strongest arguments on each side of Citizens United, then switch positions and argue the opposite view. After presenting both sides, the group works toward a nuanced synthesis position. This format requires students to understand an argument fully before they evaluate it, which builds analytical depth that simple debates don't produce.

Evaluate whether money is a form of protected speech.

Facilitation Tip

During the Structured Academic Controversy, assign roles explicitly so students prepare counterarguments before debating.

What to look for

Pose the following question to the class: 'The Supreme Court stated that money is speech. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Provide at least one piece of evidence from our readings or class discussions to support your position.'

• Analyze
• Evaluate
• Create
• Social Awareness
• Relationship Skills

Activity 02

• Fishbowl Discussion
• 45 min · Whole Class

Fishbowl Discussion: Design a Just Campaign Finance System

An inner circle of four to five students debates what rules they would impose if they could design campaign finance from scratch. Constraint: rules must either work within current constitutional precedent or students must explicitly argue why precedent should change. The outer circle tracks the strongest arguments and identifies which values are in tension.

Analyze how the need for constant fundraising affects the work of elected officials.

Facilitation Tip

For the Fishbowl discussion, limit participation to 6-8 students at a time to ensure everyone has space to contribute.

What to look for

Ask students to write on an index card: 'One way Super PACs have changed elections is ______. This change affects voters by ______.'

• Analyze
• Evaluate
• Social Awareness
• Self-Awareness

Activity 03

• Formal Debate
• 55 min · Small Groups

Data Investigation: Follow the Money

Students use publicly available FEC data or OpenSecrets summaries to trace the top donors to a recent Senate or House race in their state. They identify which industries or interest groups dominate, then cross-reference with the elected official's committee assignments and voting record on related legislation. Groups present a data-grounded hypothesis about what the funding relationship might mean in practice.

Design a just policy for campaign finance.

Facilitation Tip

When students follow the money in the Data Investigation, provide a blank template for organizing findings so they focus on analysis, not formatting.

What to look for

Present students with two brief scenarios describing political spending. Ask them to identify which scenario likely represents an illegal coordination between a campaign and an independent expenditure committee, and explain their reasoning.

• Analyze
• Evaluate
• Create
• Self-Management
• Decision-Making

Activity 04

• Gallery Walk
• 40 min · Small Groups

Gallery Walk: Campaign Finance Law Timeline

Post stations covering major milestones: FECA (1971), Buckley v. Valeo (1976), McCain-Feingold (2002), Citizens United (2010), and McCutcheon v. FEC (2014). Groups annotate each entry with what changed, who benefited, and what remained unresolved. A final synthesis station asks students to identify the single biggest unresolved tension in current law.

Evaluate whether money is a form of protected speech.

What to look for

Pose the following question to the class: 'The Supreme Court stated that money is speech. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Provide at least one piece of evidence from our readings or class discussions to support your position.'

• Understand
• Apply
• Analyze
• Create
• Relationship Skills
• Social Awareness

A few notes on teaching this unit

Teachers should anchor discussions in real examples, such as specific Super PAC ads or court cases, to make abstract rules tangible. Avoid overloading students with jargon; instead, define terms like 'independent expenditure' through examples. Research suggests students retain more when they evaluate trade-offs rather than take sides on 'good vs. bad' systems. Use the timeline activity to show how rules evolve, reinforcing that reform is ongoing, not settled.

Successful learning looks like students who can distinguish between legal and illegal coordination, explain how Super PACs function within the current system, and articulate trade-offs in campaign finance regulation. They should use evidence from readings, data, and discussions to support their positions, not just recall facts. Watch for students who move from 'what is' to 'what should be' in their reasoning.

---

Watch Out for These Misconceptions

• During the Structured Academic Controversy, watch for students repeating the misconception that Super PACs can donate directly to campaigns. Redirect them to the legal definition in the Fishbowl materials, which include excerpts from the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act and Citizens United ruling.

  During the Structured Academic Controversy, provide the Citizens United decision excerpt that explicitly states independent expenditures cannot be coordinated with campaigns. Ask students to highlight the language and explain how narrow exceptions (like the 'coordinated communication' test) are enforced.

• During the Data Investigation, watch for students assuming campaign finance rules only apply to presidential races. Redirect them to the Federal Election Commission’s breakdown of House, Senate, and presidential spending data.

  During the Data Investigation, assign each group one type of federal race (House, Senate, or presidential) and have them compare total spending across cycles. Ask them to note whether state rules differ and why that matters for local elections.

• During the Gallery Walk, watch for students conflating 'dark money' with illegal activity. Redirect them to the IRS guidelines for 501(c)(4) organizations displayed on the timeline.

  During the Gallery Walk, include a station with a sample 501(c)(4) tax filing that omits donor names. Ask students to explain how this structure is legal under current law but creates opacity, using language from the IRS and reform proposals to support their analysis.

---

Methods used in this brief

• Structured Academic Controversy
• Fishbowl Discussion
• Formal Debate
• Gallery Walk