Activity 01
Claim-Evidence-Reasoning: Explaining Ionization Energy Exceptions
Students examine a graph of first ionization energies across period 2 and identify two anomalies (B < Be and O < N). Working individually, they write a CER statement explaining each anomaly using orbital diagrams. Pairs then challenge each other's reasoning, and the class shares out to build a collective explanation grounded in subshell electron pairing.
Differentiate between ionization energy and electron affinity, explaining their periodic trends.
Facilitation TipDuring the Claim-Evidence-Reasoning activity, provide real ionization energy graphs so students can see the boron and oxygen dips for themselves before explaining them.
What to look forProvide students with a periodic table and ask them to circle elements that are likely to have high first ionization energies and underline elements likely to have very negative electron affinities. Then, ask them to justify their choices for two elements using Zeff and shielding.