Activity 01
Structured Academic Controversy: Tyrant or Visionary?
Student pairs receive an evidence brief for each position. They argue their assigned side, then reverse and argue the opposing view, then work together to produce a nuanced consensus statement about Shi Huangdi's historical legacy that acknowledges evidence on both sides.
Critique whether Shi Huangdi was a visionary leader or a cruel tyrant.
Facilitation TipDuring Structured Academic Controversy, assign roles so students must defend positions they may personally oppose.
What to look forPose the question: 'Was Shi Huangdi a visionary leader or a cruel tyrant?' Instruct students to find at least two pieces of evidence to support each side of the argument and share their findings in small groups, citing specific policies or actions.